1
$\begingroup$

Can I define a Hilbert basis as follows?

A Hilbert basis $B$ of a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ is a orthonormal set in $\mathcal{H}$ with $$\mathcal{H} = \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^\infty \alpha_i b_i \,\middle|\, \alpha_i \in \mathbb{C}, b_i \in B \right\}$$

Background

The definition I know is the following: A Hilbert basis $B$ is defined as a maximal orthonormal set in $\mathcal{H}$.

I know that the (topological) closure of the span of $B$ generates $\mathcal{H}$:

$$ \mathcal{H} = \text{cl}(\text{span}(B)) $$

I also know that the span only generates finite linear combinations of $B$, i.e.,

$$ \text{span}(B)= \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i b_i \,\middle|\, \alpha_i \in \mathbb{C}, b_i \in B, n \in \mathbb{N} \right\} $$

Finally, I know from this question that I can generate $\mathcal{H}$ by a "more liberal span", that also produces infinite linear combinations.

$$ \mathcal{H} = \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^\infty \alpha_i b_i \,\middle|\, \alpha_i \in \mathbb{C}, b_i \in B \right\} $$

However, I do not know if the converse holds, i.e., if my definition is sufficient to characterize all Hilbert bases.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I really don't think the term "Hilbert basis" is standard here - better just to say "orthonormal basis". (For example, the "Hilbert basis theorem" is not about orthonormal bases in a Hilbert space...) $\endgroup$ Jun 15 '18 at 13:37
2
$\begingroup$

There is a problem with what you have written since $\sum \alpha_i b_i$ is not defined for all choices of $\alpha_i$'s and $b_i$'s. Actually, the series converges in the norm iff $\sum |\alpha_i|^{2} <\infty$ (assuming that $b_i$'s are distinct). If you put this condition on the coefficients the assertion is correct. In other words, $\mathcal H =\{\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \alpha_i b_i : \{b_i\} \subset B,\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} |\alpha_i|^{2} <\infty\}$

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

An Hilbert basis in a functional space is essentially an orthonormal Schauder basis, that is a different thing with respect to a usual (Hamel) basis in finite dimensional vector space, and we have that:

any element $v$ of the Hilbert space can be expressed by a series $$ v=\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_ib_i $$ where $b_i$ are the elements of a Schauder basis and $\{a_i\}$ is a sequence of scalars.

But there are elements of the Hilbert space that cannot be expressed by a finite linear combination of element of the basis.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.