# Fourier transform of $\frac{\sin{x}}{x}$

can you help me with this question find $\sin$ Fourier transform of $\frac{\sin{x}}{x}$

I write the Fourier transform as

$$\hat{f}(v) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{\sin{x}}{x} e^{-i 2 \pi v x}$$

Consider, rather, the integral

$$\frac{1}{i 2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{i x}-e^{-i x}}{x} e^{-i 2 \pi v x}$$

$$= \frac{1}{i 2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{i (1-2 \pi v) x}}{x} - \frac{1}{i 2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{-i (1+2 \pi v) x}}{x}$$

Consider the following integral corresponding to the first integral:

$$\oint_C dz \: \frac{e^{i (1-2 \pi v) z}}{z}$$

where $C$ is the contour defined in the illustration below:

This integral is zero because there are no poles contained within the contour. Write the integral over the various pieces of the contour:

$$\int_{C_R} dz \: \frac{e^{i (1- 2 \pi v)z}}{z} + \int_{C_r} dz \: \frac{e^{i (1- 2 \pi v) z}}{z} + \int_{-R}^{-r} dx \: \frac{e^{i (1- 2 \pi v) x}}{x} + \int_{r}^{R} dx \: \frac{e^{i (1- 2 \pi v) x}}{x}$$

Consider the first part of this integral about $C_R$, the large semicircle of radius $R$:

$$\int_{C_R} dz \: \frac{e^{i (1- 2 \pi v)z}}{z} = i \int_0^{\pi} d \theta e^{i (1-2 \pi v) R (\cos{\theta} + i \sin{\theta})}$$

$$= i \int_0^{\pi} d \theta e^{i (1-2 \pi v) R \cos{\theta}} e^{-(1- 2 \pi v) R \sin{\theta}}$$

By Jordan's lemma, this integral vanishes as $R \rightarrow \infty$ when $1-2 \pi v > 0$. On the other hand,

$$\int_{C_r} dz \: \frac{e^{i (1-2 \pi v) z}}{z} = i \int_{\pi}^0 d \phi \: e^{i (1-2 \pi v) r e^{i \phi}}$$

This integral takes the value $-i \pi$ as $r \rightarrow 0$. We may then say that

\begin{align} & \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{i (1-2 \pi v) x}}{x} = i \pi & 1-2 \pi v > 0\\ \end{align}

When $1-2 \pi v < 0$, Jordan's lemma does not apply, and we need to use another contour. A contour for which Jordan's lemma does apply is one flipped about the $\Re{z}=x$ axis. By using similar steps as above, it is straightforward to show that

\begin{align} & \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{i (1-2 \pi v) x}}{x} = -i \pi & 1-2 \pi v < 0\\ \end{align}

Using a similar analysis as above, we find that

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{e^{-i (1+2 \pi v) x}}{x} = \begin{cases} -i \pi & 1+2 \pi v < 0 \\ i \pi & 1+2 \pi v >0 \\ \end{cases}$$

We may now say that

$$\hat{f}(v) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \: \frac{\sin{x}}{x} e^{-i 2 \pi v x} = \begin{cases} \pi & |v| < \frac{1}{2 \pi} \\ 0 & |v| > \frac{1}{2 \pi} \\ \end{cases}$$

• What about when $\vert v \vert = 1/2\pi$?
– Max
Apr 21 '20 at 3:27
• @Max The value at any specific point can be arbitrarily set, since the Fourier Transform does not distinguish between functions that coincide almost everywhere, see the accepted answer of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2172510/… Dec 16 '20 at 9:38

Note that the sinc function is not in $L^1$; therefore you cannot compute its Fourier transform in the "obvious" way by means of the residue theorem or something like that. But this function is in $L^2$, so it is indeed Fourier related to some other function $f\in L^2$. If we can guess an $f$ such that its inverse Fourier transform is sinc we are done.

Now we know from Fourier series as well as from Fourier transform that sinc turns up when processing a rectangle pulse. Therefore we try $$f(\omega):=\cases{c\quad &\bigl(|\omega|< \Omega\bigr) \cr 0&\bigl(|\omega|> \Omega\bigr) \cr}$$ with parameters $c$ and $\Omega$ yet to be determined. At any rate $${\cal F}^{-1}f(x)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(\omega)e^{i\omega x}\ d\omega=c\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega e^{i\omega x}\ d\omega={2c\sin(\Omega x)\over\Omega}\ .$$ Now adjust the parameters $c$ and $\Omega$ to your needs. (Note that your definition of ${\cal F}$, resp. ${\cal F}^{-1}$, might lead to slightly different values.)

• I don't understand your first sentence. While the function $f(x) = \frac{\sin{x}}{x}$ is not $\in L^1$, it doesn't matter with respect to being able to compute the Fourier transform $\hat{f}(v)$ by contour integration; see my solution. Jan 19 '13 at 13:04
• @rigordonna: Your calculation is alright; but you have computed the Fourier transform as a principal value of an improper integral, not as an $L^1$-integral. Jan 19 '13 at 16:48
• correct. But what does that have to do with an "obvious" use of the Residue theorem? I understand that you are referring to the fact that the "singularity" lies on the integration contour. But, as you point out, we avoid it using a PV-like avoidance. I could have also included the "pole" within the contour and got the same result. Jan 19 '13 at 16:54
• @rigordonma: The word "obvious" referred to calculating the Fourier transform in $L^1$. Note that your approach wasn't here when I posted mine. Otherwise I would have posted mine anyway, but avoiding the word "obvious". Jan 19 '13 at 18:34

You've got:

$$F(w) = \int \frac{\sin x}{ x} exp(-iw x) dx$$

Differentiate wrt $w$ to get:

$$F'(w) = -i \int \sin x exp(- iwx)dx$$

You know how to find fourier transform of sine and then you should integrate your result.