1
$\begingroup$

Let $(E_i,T_i)_{i\in I}$ be a family of topological spaces, and let $(E,T)$ be the product of these spaces. Let $f_i:E\to E_i\ (i\in I)$ be a family of mappings. Suppose that each $f_i$ is $(T,T_i)-$ continuous. Denote the product of these mappings by $\displaystyle\prod_{i\in I}f_i,$ or shortly $f.$

Denote the image of $f$ by $D,$ and let $T_D$ be the subspace topology on $D$ inherited from $(E,T).$

Next we'll introduce a condition for family $ (f_i)_{i\in I}.$

Condition: For any $T-$ closed set $F,$ and for any $x\in E/F,$ there exits some $i\in I,$ such that $f_i(x)\notin\mathrm{Cl}_{T_i}\big(f_i(F)\big).$ (Here $\mathrm{Cl}_{T_i}$ means taking the closure with respect to topology $T_i$.)

Claim: If the family $(f_i)_{i\in I}$ satisfies the condition above, then the map $f$ is $(T,T_D)-$ open ,i.e. $X$ is a $T-$ open set $\Longrightarrow$ $f(X)$ is a $T_D-$ open set.

Question: Is the claim above true or false? Any help would be appreciated.

Background: I encountered this claim in a topology workbook, A General Topology Workbook by Iain T.Adamson, and I highly suspect its validity. The condition looks quite weird to me. My doubt rose when I found that the proof on that book is wrong. I tried to find one counterexample, but only got lost in details of the construction of each $f_i.$

Update: I find that in that very book, using the claim above the author proves an astonishing result: every topological space $(E,T)$ is homeomorphic to a subspace of $(\prod_{i\in I}X,\ \prod_{I\in I}T_0),$ here $X=\left\{a,b,c\right\},T_0=\left\{\emptyset,\left\{a\right\},X\right\},\ I=E\cup T.$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The last claim might sound fantastic, but is quite valid. We use the points $b$ and $c$ to separate points, so that $f$ becomes 1-1, and the open singleton $a$ to separate points and closed sets. Embedding theorems are quite strong and used a lot, not only for this simple fact, but also to embed Tychonoff spaces in powers of $[0,1]$, which is a step in proving that compactifications exist etc. What book are you using? $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jun 10 '18 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ I'm using A General Topology Workbook by Iain T.Adamson. $\endgroup$ – painday Jun 10 '18 at 14:37
2
$\begingroup$

Let $E_i$ be the set of spaces we take the product of, and $E$ their product (with product topolgoy induced by the projections $\pi_i : E \to E_i$ as usual). Suppose we have $f_i : X \to E_i$ from some fixed space $X$ (need not be the product $E$ as the OP writes) which obeys the condition that $\{f_i: i \in I\}$ separates points from closed sets, which is the OP's condition:

$$\forall F \subseteq X \text{ closed }: \forall x \in X \setminus F: \exists i\in I: f_i(x) \notin \overline{f_i[F]}$$

where bar denotes closure in $E_i$ (clear from context). The function $f(x)$ from $X$ into $E$ defined by $f(x)_i = f_i(x)$ for all $x \in X, i \in I$ is well-defined and continuous (at least when all $f_i$ are continuous, which is commonly assumed in this setting).

The condition above is equivalent to the following:

$\mathcal{B}:= \{(f_i)^{-1}(U): i \in I, U \subseteq E_i \text { open }\}$ is a base for the topology of $X$.

which I show here as an answer to a question.

Now, to my point: knowing that $\mathcal{B}$ is a base, to check $f$ is open from $X$ to $f[X] \subseteq E$ (the set the OP calls $D$) in the subspace topology, we only have to show that $f[O]$ is open in $D$ whenever $O \in \mathcal{B}$ (we only have to check openness on base elements as $f[\cup_i O_i] = \cup_i f[O_i]$ etc.). To see that $f$ sends base elements to open sets: let $O = f_i^{-1}[U]$ where $U \subseteq E_i$ is open, so an arbitary element of $\mathcal{B}$.

Then $$f[O] = D \cap \pi_i^{-1}[U]$$ showing that $f[O]$ is indeed relatively open in $D$. To see the set equality, check two inclusions: if $y \in f[O]$, then certainly $y \in f[X] = D$, but also, $y = f(x)$ with $x \in O= f_i^{-1}[U]$, which implies that $f_i(x) \in U$, but by how $f$ is defined from the $f_i$, this just means $y_i \in U$ or $y \in \pi_i^{-1}[U]$, so indeed $y \in D \cap \pi_i^{-1}[U]$. Reversely, if $y \in D \cap \pi_i^{-1}[U]$ we know that $y_i \in U$ and $y = f(x)$ for some $X \in X$. This $x$ obeys $f_i(x) = f(x)_i = y_i \in U$ so $x \in f_i^{-1}[U] = O$ and so $y \in f[O]$ QED.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent answer! BTW, could you please explain why the function $f$ is continuous? Is it a direct implication of the condition? $\endgroup$ – painday Jun 10 '18 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, how careless I am! The workbook states the continuity of $f_i$ as an extra condition, which is not in the formal context... $\endgroup$ – painday Jun 10 '18 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ @painday I'll formulate it better: $f$ is continuous whenever all $f_i$ are because of the universal property of products: $f: X \to E$ is continuous iff $\pi_i \circ f: X \to E_i$ is continuous for all $i$, see my general post here on initial topologies. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jun 10 '18 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I can see it with an elementary knowledge of category theory. $\endgroup$ – painday Jun 10 '18 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ @painday Probably your book comes to the classic general embedding theorem: if $f_i: X \to E_i$ is a family of continuous functions, such that the family separates points (i.e. $\forall x \neq y \in X: \exists i \in I: f_i(x) \neq f_i(y)$) and separates points and closed sets, then the diagonal product map $f$ is an embedding of $X$ into $\prod_i E_i$. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jun 10 '18 at 14:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.