1
$\begingroup$

Each year, the maximum height $X$ of a river is measured. A value over $6\,\text{m}$ would be catastrophic. The distribution $X$ is supposed to be Rayleigh, i.e its density is $$f_{X}(x)=(x/a)e^{-x^{2}/(2a)}\text{,}\ \ x>0 \ \text{,}\ a>0$$ where $a$ is unknown. We observed the following heights in meter over eight years:$$2.5,\ 2.9,\ 1.8,\ 0.9,\ 1.7,\ 2.1,\ 2.2,\ 2.8$$ a) Give the maximum likelihood estimate for $a$.
b) Compute the standard error for the estimated probability $p$ of a catastrophe in a given year, and use it to give a confidence interval for $p$.

Okay, so I managed to do a), and found $\hat{a} = 2.42$ approx.

I also managed to find the estimated probability of a catastrophe in a given year, i.e $$\hat{p}=P(X>6 \ |\ a) = e^{-18/a}.$$

Now, when it comes to computing the standard error, i.e the root of the variance of $\hat{p}$, I do not know how exactly I can do that.

Here is my attempt:$$\operatorname{var}(\hat{p}) = \operatorname{var}(\hat{p}(\hat{a})) = \hat{p}'(\hat{a})\cdot \operatorname{var}(\hat{a}).$$

Now, how do I compute $\operatorname{var}(\hat{a})$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Suggest you see 'parameter estimation` in the relevant Wikipedia article. Is the estimate in (b) a function of $\alpha?$ $\endgroup$ – BruceET Jun 8 '18 at 21:06
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is. I mean, in a) I get an estimator for $a$, and the estimated $p$ depends on $\hat{a}$ $\endgroup$ – Skyris Jun 8 '18 at 21:39
2
+50
$\begingroup$

$\def\dto{\xrightarrow{\mathrm{d}}}\def\vec{\boldsymbol}$First, because$$ L(a; \vec{x}) = f_{\vec{X}}(\vec{x}; a) = \prod_{k = 1}^n \frac{x_k}{a} \exp\left( -\frac{x_k^2}{2a} \right) = \frac{1}{a^n} \left( \prod_{k = 1}^n x_k \right) \exp\left( -\frac{1}{2a} \sum_{k = 1}^n x_k^2 \right),\\ l(a; \vec{x}) = \ln(L(a; \vec{x})) = -\frac{1}{2a} \sum_{k = 1}^n x_k^2 - n \ln a + \sum_{k = 1}^n \ln x_k, $$ then$$ \frac{\partial l}{\partial a}(a; \vec{x}) = \frac{1}{2a^2} \sum_{k = 1}^n x_k^2 - \frac{n}{a} \Longrightarrow \widehat{a}_n = \frac{1}{2n} \sum_{k = 1}^n X_k^2. $$

Next, since $X_1, \cdots, X_n$ are i.i.d, then $X_1^2, \cdots, X_n^2$ are also i.i.d., and$$ f_{X_1}(x; a) = \frac{x}{a} \exp\left( -\frac{x^2}{2a} \right)\ (x > 0) \Longrightarrow f_{X_1^2}(y; a) = \frac{1}{2a} \exp\left( -\frac{y}{2a} \right)\ (y > 0). $$ Thus,$$ D(\widehat{a}_n) = \frac{1}{4n^2} D\left( \sum_{k = 1}^n X_k^2 \right) = \frac{1}{4n} D(X_1^2) = \frac{a^2}{n}. $$

Now, note that$$ p = P_a(X > 6) = \exp\left( -\frac{18}{a} \right) \Longrightarrow \widehat{p}_n = \exp\left( -\frac{18}{\widehat{a}_n} \right). $$ Since $E(X_1^2) = 2a$, $D(X_1^2) = 4a^2$, by the central limit theorem,$$ \sqrt{n} · \frac{2 \widehat{a}_n - E(X_1^2)}{\sqrt{\smash[b]{D(X_1^2)}}} \dto N(0, 1) \Longrightarrow \sqrt{n} (\widehat{a}_n - a) \dto N(0, a^2). $$ Define $g(x) = \exp\left( -\dfrac{18}{x} \right)$. By the delta method,$$ \sqrt{n} (\widehat{p}_n - p) = \sqrt{n} (g(\widehat{a}_n) - g(a)) \dto N(0, (g'(a))^2 · a^2) = N\left( 0, 18\exp\left( -\frac{18}{a} \right) \right). $$ Thus approximately, $\widehat{p}_n - p \sim N\left( 0, \dfrac{18}{n} \exp\left( -\dfrac{18}{a} \right) \right)$, and$$ D(\widehat{p}_n) ≈ \frac{18}{n} \exp\left( -\frac{18}{a} \right) ≈ \frac{18}{n} \exp\left( -\frac{18}{\widehat{a}_n} \right). $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. However, could you please explain the first two lines ? Namely, why is the MLE a sum ? Also, I do not get how you transform $f_{X_1}(x;a)$ into $f_{X_{1}^2}(y;a)$. Apart from that, I think I understood everything $\endgroup$ – Skyris Jun 11 '18 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ For $\hat{a}$, what I did was to find the log-likelihood of $a$, find the derivative of this, and then equate it to 0. Which is correct, I mean, the result I got is the right one (according the correction sheet). I don't understand why you have that $\hat{a} = \frac{1}{2n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}^{2}$ Where does this come from ? $\endgroup$ – Skyris Jun 11 '18 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ Acutally, sorry. I do understand how you transformed $f_{X_1}$ into $f_{X_{1}^{2}}$, all that remains to be explained is that sum. $\endgroup$ – Skyris Jun 11 '18 at 12:44
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Yes, as I said, I understand the transformation. My only problem is with your initial statement, namely that $\hat{a}_{n} = \frac{1}{2n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} X_{n}^{2}$. Where does that come from ? I mean, I can find it on wikipedia, but I am not supposed to know that. Which, means that, since I do not know it, I need to find it. The question is, how am I suppose to assert that $\hat{a}_{n} = \frac{1}{2n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} X_{n}^{2}$. I am asking this, because during an exam, I won't be able to check wikipedia... $\endgroup$ – Skyris Jun 11 '18 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Skyris I've added the derivation of $\widehat a_n$. $\endgroup$ – Saad Jun 12 '18 at 0:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.