1
$\begingroup$

Given $X\subseteq \Bbb R^m, f:X\to\Bbb R$ and $x\in X$, we say $f$ is lower semicontinous (l.s.c for short) at x if
$\forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists\ \delta >0\ \forall \in B(\delta,x), \ f(x)\le f(y)+\varepsilon$.
If x is a limit point of $X$, then f is lower semicontinuous iff $f(x)\le \lim_{\delta\to0^+}\ \inf\ f{\restriction}(X\cap B^*(\delta,y))$. And, it is also given that $A\subseteq\Bbb R^m\times\Bbb R$, put $\pi(A)=\{x\in \Bbb R^m:\exists p\in \Bbb R,(x,p)\in A\}$, the projection of $A$ on $\Bbb R^m$. For $x\in\Bbb R^m$, put $A_x=\{p\in \Bbb R:(x,p)\in A\}$, the fiber of $A$ over $x$.

Then, I need to show:
if $A\subseteq\Bbb R^m\times\Bbb R$ is compact and $g:\pi(A)\to\Bbb R$ is defined by $g(x)=\inf\ A_x$, then g is lower semicontinuous.

I got some idea about this problem, which is bu using the iff statement of limit inferior to show if g is not lsc, then it contradicts to the condition that $A$ is not compact. But I just do not know how to show this formally.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Assume that the iff statement is violated. Then you get $\varepsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n \to x$ with $g(x) > g(x_n) + \varepsilon$.. Now this should help you to get a contradiction with the definition of $g$ / the compacity of $A$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.