Let $f $ be an irreducible quartic over a field $K $ of characteristic zero, $G $ the Galois group of $f $, and $u $ a root of $f $. Show that there is no field properly between $K $ and $K (u) $ if and only if $G=A_4$ or $G=S_4$.

Here is my work so far:

I first got the group lattice structures of $S_4$ and $A_4 $from on-line. As $f$ is irreducible over a field of char $0, f $is separable and hence $G (F/K)$ is Galois where $F$ is a splitting field of $K $. Hence by Fundamental Theorem it suffices to show there is no proper subgroup between $G=G (F/K)$ and $G (F/K (u))$ iff $G=A_4$ or $G=S_4.$ We know that $G (F/K (u))$ is Galois. As $f$ is quartic and $f$ is irreducible, we have that the minimal polynomial of $u $ is $f$ itself. If $G $ is isomorphic to $S_4$ then since $G (F/K (u)) $ fixes $u $ it injects into $S_3$. If $G(F/K (u)) $ is isomorphic to $S_3$ then there's no subgroup properly between them. It cannot be isomorphic to a group of order two since it (viewed as a subgroup of $S_3$) cannot leave one of the three (non-$u $) roots fixed since it's Galois. I am not sure why it being isomorphic to $A_3$ would lead to a contradiction.

I am not sure how to proceed further. I somehow must be looking at the group order/index of various subgroups of $S_4$ and $A_4$...

  • $\begingroup$ Since $u$ is a root of $f$ and $f$ is irreducible, $f$ must be the minimal polynomial of $f$. I would proceed to show that $G(F/K(u))$ isomorphic to $S_3 \subseteq S_4$ or $A_3 \subseteq A_4$ depending on whether $G$ is $S_4$ or $A_4$. $\endgroup$ – michaelhowes Jun 2 '18 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ For the converse, we know that $f$ is irreucible so that $G$ must be a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. By looking at the subgroups of $S_4$ we should be able to deduce that given there is no subgroup between $G(F/K(u))$ and $G$, $G$ must be $S_4$ or $A_4$. $\endgroup$ – michaelhowes Jun 2 '18 at 22:40
  • $\begingroup$ I'll write up a more detailed answer now. $\endgroup$ – michaelhowes Jun 2 '18 at 23:19

Let $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4 \in F$, be the four roots of $f$. As you noted above because $Char(K)=0$ and $f$ is irreducible, $f$ is separable and each $u_i$ is distinct. Without loss of generality let $u=u_4$.

Now note that for all $\sigma \in G$, $\sigma \in G(F/K(u))$ if and only if $\sigma(u)=u$. Thus, if we view $G$ as a subgroup of Perm$\{u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4\}\cong S_4$, we have that $G(F/K(u))=G \cap S_3$ where $S_3$ is the subgroup of Perm$\{u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4\}$ of all permutations that fix $u_4$.

Thus if $G=S_4$ or $G=A_4$, we have that $G(F/K(u))=S_4 \cap S_3=S_3$ or $G(F/K(u))=A_4\cap S_3=A_3$ respectively. From your lattice of subgroups, we can note that there are no proper subgroups between $S_3$ and $S_4$ and $A_3$ and $A_4$.

Now for the converse. Since $f$ is irreducible, $G$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. The transitive subgroups of $S_4$ are $S_4$, $A_4$, the dihedral group $D_8$ and its conjugate, the Klien four group $V_4$ and $C_4$ and its conjugates (see here for more about transitive subgroups of $S_4$).

For each of these groups we can look at $G(F/K(u))=S_3 \cap G$. And note that when $G\neq S_4,A_4$, there exists a proper subgroup $S_3\cap G \subsetneq H \subsetneq G$. For example when $G=D_8$, $D_8 \cap S_3$ is the trivial subgroup and thus there are many such subgroups $H$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.