3
$\begingroup$

Let $K_i, i\in I$ compact sets in a Hausdorff space $X$ and $K=\bigcap_{i\in I} K_i$ and $\Omega_i,i\in I$ a family of open sets such that $$K\subset \bigcup_{i\in I}\Omega_i$$

How to find a finite sub cover ?

Thank you

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ This is tagged with general topology. So, I assume you are not working in a metrizable context. It is NOT true that the intersection of compact subsets is compact, even for finite intersections. Take a look at non-Hausdorff spaces. $\endgroup$ – user370967 Jun 1 '18 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ It is, however, true whenever compact sub-spaces are also closed subspaces. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Jun 1 '18 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Math_QED i edited my question I'm on a Hausdorff space $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Jun 1 '18 at 18:39
3
$\begingroup$

I'm not sure about whether there is a direct way of finding it. But you can (assuming that your space is Hausdorff) say that $\bigcap_{i\in I}K$ is a closed subset of $K_i$ (for some $i\in I$ chosen by you) and that closed subsets of compact spaces are compact.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If the space is separated, then $K_1$ is covered by $U_i$ and $X-\cap K_i$, take the finite cover induced.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ because a compac subset is not always closed. $\endgroup$ – Tsemo Aristide Jun 1 '18 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ How to find that $K_i $ is covered ? $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Jun 1 '18 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ if $x$ in $K_1$ is not in $\cap K_i$, it is in $X-\cap K_i$. $\endgroup$ – Tsemo Aristide Jun 1 '18 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ $K_i= K\cup (K_{i}\setminus K)$ you use this ? then $K_i \subset \bigcup\Omega_i\cup (K_i\setminus K)$ $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Jun 1 '18 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ yes, it is the idea. $\endgroup$ – Tsemo Aristide Jun 1 '18 at 18:51
0
$\begingroup$

Given that $\{\Omega_i\}_{i\in I}$ covers $K$, one has \begin{align*} X= (X\setminus K)\cup\bigcup_{i\in I}\Omega_i.\tag{$\star$} \end{align*} Take your favorite index $i^*\in I$. It follows from ($\star$) that $$K_{i^*}\subseteq (X\setminus K)\cup\bigcup_{i\in I}\Omega_i,$$ so that $\{\Omega_i\}_{i\in I}$ and $X\setminus K$ together form an open cover of $K_{i^*}$ (the extra assumption that $X$ is Hausdorff guarantees that each of $\{K_i\}_{i\in I}$ is closed, so that $X\setminus K$ is open, right?).

Since $K_{i^*}$ is compact, and $\{\Omega_i\}_{i\in I}$ and $X\setminus K$ together form an open cover of it, there must exist a finite subcover, say $\Omega_{i_1},\ldots,\Omega_{i_n}$ for some positive integer $n$ and $i_1,\ldots,i_n\in I$, and $X\setminus K$ may or may not be included in this subcover. One may assume that $X\setminus K$ is in this subcover (if not, adding $X\setminus K$ to the finite subcover $\{\Omega_{i_1},\ldots,\Omega_{i_n}\}$ would still result in a finite subcover), so that $$K_{i^*}\subseteq(X\setminus K)\cup\Omega_{i_1}\cup\cdots\cup\Omega_{i_n}.$$

Now, $K$ is a subset of $K_{i^*}$, so one has also that $$K\subseteq(X\setminus K)\cup\Omega_{i_1}\cup\cdots\cup\Omega_{i_n}.$$ Since $X\setminus K$ has no common element with $K$, one may remove it from this cover to end up with $$K\subseteq\Omega_{i_1}\cup\cdots\cup\Omega_{i_n},$$ which is a finite subcover of the original cover, as sought.

Note that the exact composition of the subcover $\{\Omega_{i_m}\}_{m=1}^n$ may depend on the favorite index $i^*\in I$ you have chosen (different choices may result in different subcovers), but the conclusion that one always ends up with a finite subcover still holds in all cases.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.