Regular map between quasiprojective varieties are continuous From this, we know that regular maps between quasi-projective varieties are continuous.

My question- If $f:X \to Y$ is continuous, and for every $x \in X$ and for every regular function $\varphi$ in a neighbourhood of $f(x)$ the function $f^*\varphi$ is regular in neighbourhood of $x$ then $f$ is regular.


I think that your question has been put in the wrong way!

Example. Let $\mathbb{K}=\overline{\mathbb{Z}_p}$ be the algebraic closure of the field of integer numbers modulo $p\in\mathbb{P}$, and let $X=Y=\mathbb{A}^1_{\mathbb{K}}$; considering the following maps of $X$ in itself: \begin{gather} O:x\in X\to 0\in X,\\ F:x\in X\to x^p-x\in X; \end{gather} one has that as maps $O=F$, but as regular maps $O\neq F$ because $O^{*}$ is the zero endomorphism of $\mathbb{K}[t]$ and $F^{*}$ is the Frobenius endomorphism of $\mathbb{K}[t]$. $\triangle$

From all this, your question can be put in this right way: let $f:X\to Y$ be a continuous map between quasi-projective varieties and, for any $y\in Y$ there exists an open subset $U_y$ of $Y$, $f^{*}_{U_y}:\varphi\in\mathcal{O}_Y(U_y)\to(\varphi\circ f)\in\mathcal{O}_X(f^{-1}(U_y))$ is a well-defined function; where $\mathcal{O}_Y(U_y)$ is the ring of regular functions of $Y$ on $U_y$, and similar statement holds for $\mathcal{O}_X(f^{-1}(U_y))$.

Does $\left(f,\left\{f^{*}_{U_y}\right\}_{y\in Y}\right)$ define a regular morphism?

Easily one proves that $f^{*}_{U_y}$ is a morphism of rings for any $y\in Y$; for any $V\subseteq U_y$ open subset, one has that $r^{U_y}_V:\varphi\in\mathcal{O}_Y(U_y)\to\varphi_{|V}\in\mathcal{O}_Y(V)$ is a well-defined morphism of rings, and $r^{f^{-1}(U_y)}_{f^{-1}(V)}\circ f^{*}_{U_y}=f^{*}_V\circ r^{U_y}_V$.

By Shafarevich - Basic Algebraic Geometry 1, II ed. (1994) Springer-Verlag, lemma I.4.2.2, you can assume that $V_y\subseteq U_y$ is an affine open neighbourhood of $y$ in $Y$ and $W_y\subseteq f^{-1}(V_y)$ is an affine open subset; so $f_{|W_y}$ is a regular map of affine open subsets, by definition $f$ is a regular morphism at any point of $X$, that is $f$ is a regular map.

  • $\begingroup$ for me field K is algebraically closed $\endgroup$
    – user345777
    May 24 '18 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I can change $\mathbb{Z}_p$ with its algebraic closure $\overline{\mathbb{Z}_p}$ and the example holds the same. $\endgroup$ May 24 '18 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ I am actually the beginner in the subject, I don't understand the language of schemes yet (so,i can't say if we are on the same page) i am reading the first chapter of Shafarevich basic algebraic geometry, and in that he has left above question as exercise. $\endgroup$
    – user345777
    May 25 '18 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ I'm addicted by schemes X-D ... but the reasoning holds. I check on Shafarevich's book as he introduces the regular maps of quasi-projective varieties, and I shall put my answer in "Shafarevich like" way. I promise. ;) $\endgroup$ May 26 '18 at 9:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ the comment he makes is on page no 38. $\endgroup$
    – user345777
    May 28 '18 at 19:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.