1
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be any field and $E$ an extension of $F$ with $[E:F]=n$. So $E$ is an algebraic extension and so we can assume that $E$ is inside the algebraic closure $\overline{F}$ of $F$.

Then there are $n$ isomorphisms of $E$ into $\overline{F}$ which fix $F$ elementwise (is this right, independent of characteristic of $F$?). Let these isomoephisms be $\sigma_1,\cdots,\sigma_n$.

Q.1 Suppose $x\in E$ is such that $\sigma_i(x)=x$ for $i=1,2,\cdots,n$. Then should $x$ be in $F$?

If $E$ is Galois extension then answer is yes, but I am considering a variation of that.


Q.2 The isomorphisms $\sigma_1,\cdots,\sigma_n$ not necessarily form a group since $E$ may not be Galois extension. Is the Dedekind's lemma valid, i.e. is it true that $\sigma_1,\cdots,\sigma_n:E\rightarrow \overline{F}$ are independent in the sense that $a_1\sigma_1 + \cdots + a_n\sigma_n=0$ on $E$ ($a_i\in F$) implies $a_1=\cdots=a_n=0$?

I saw Dedekind's theorem in the context where $\sigma_i$'s form a group, but here the situation is general than it.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

There are $n$ embeddings of $E$ into $\overline F$ fixing $F$ if and only if $E/F$ is a separable extension. If $E/F$ is inseparable, there are fewer.

If $x\in E$, $x\notin F$ and $x$ is separable over $F$ then there are $\sigma_j(x)\ne\sigma_k(x)$. This is because the minimum polynomial of $x$ over $F$ has more than one root in $\overline F$.

Dededkind's lemma works in full generality; there is no need to assume that the $\sigma_j$ form a group.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.