0
$\begingroup$

Is Smith-Volterra-Cantor set[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith%E2%80%93Volterra%E2%80%93Cantor_set ] only example of positive Lebesgue measure compact set which does not contain interval?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ how do you define "only"? The union of the usual Cantor middle-third set, with a fat Cantor set (or what you call Smith-Volterra-Cantor set) would also have these properties. $\endgroup$
    – Mirko
    May 20, 2018 at 4:08
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah. I mean are there another type (not union of compact set and fat cantor set) of positive measure compact set containing no interval? $\endgroup$ May 20, 2018 at 4:35
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ a compact set of reals would have a smallest point $a$ and a largest point $b$, and infinitely many open intervals in between that are removed, so in the end it does not contain any interval. It might contain some isolated points, and it must be uncountable, and hence contain a homeomorphic copy of the usual Cantor set. More or less, it would be the only example, subject to clarifying the meaning of "only", and taking some possible but perhaps inessential variations into account. Or,perhaps I should say it is not the only one, since in general it need not itself be homeomorphic to a Cantor set $\endgroup$
    – Mirko
    May 20, 2018 at 4:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Mirko. Your comment is good enough for me. $\endgroup$ May 20, 2018 at 4:57
  • $\begingroup$ Related --- Nowhere dense subsets of $[0,1]$ with positive measure other than fat Cantor sets $\endgroup$ May 20, 2018 at 16:00

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

$(1).$ Example. Let $S=\{s_n: n\in \Bbb N\}$ be any countable dense subset of $(0,1).$ Let $(t_n)_{n\in \Bbb N}$ be any sequence in $\Bbb R^+$ such that $\sum_{n\in \Bbb N}t_n<1/2.$

Let $U= \{(-t_n+s_n,\;t_n+s_n)\cap (0,1):n\in \Bbb N\}.$ Let $V=[0,1]\backslash \bigcup U.$ Since the measure of $\bigcup U$ cannot exceed $2\sum_{n\in \Bbb N}t_n ,$ which is less than $1,$ the measure of $V$ is not $0.$

And $V$ has empty interior because $[0,1]\backslash V\supset S$ and $S$ is dense in $[0,1].$

$(2).$ In general, if $V$ is compact with empty interior and positive measure let $a=\min V$ and $b=\max V .$ Then $(a,b)\backslash V=\bigcup F$ where $F$ is a countable family of pair-wise disjoint open sub-intervals of $(a,b).$ With $m$ denoting Lebesgue measure, we have $\sum_{f\in F}m(f)=m(\bigcup F) =(b-a)-m(V)<b-a.$

Note: In $(1)$, the family $U$ is not necessarily pair-wise disjoint, but $\bigcup U=\bigcup F$ where $F$ is a countable family of pair-wise disjoint open sub-intervals of $(0,1).$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ If $L=\lbrace (-t_m+s_n, t_m+s_n)\cap (0, 1): m,n \in \mathbb{N} \rbrace $ then is $\cup U=\cup L$? $\endgroup$ May 21, 2018 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ No. Let $T=\sup_{m\in N} t_m.$ For each $n$ we have $(-T+s_n,T+s_n) \cap (0,1)\subset \cup L.$ Since $T>0$ and $S$ is dense in $(0,1)$ this implies $\cup L=(0,1).$ $\endgroup$ May 21, 2018 at 21:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .