The title of my question is Proposition 3.35 in Freyd's Abelian categories. The proof says

If $G$ is a generator and $A$ is any object, then a subobject $A' \longrightarrow A$ is distinguished by the subset $(G,A') \subseteq (G, A)$.

What does "distinguished by" mean and why does this prove the proposition?


By "generator" Freyd surely means "strong generator". Anyway, let $A' \to A$ be a monomorphism, and consider the map $\textrm{Hom}(G, A') \to \textrm{Hom}(G, A)$. This is certainly injective, by the definition of monomorphism, so we may identify $\textrm{Hom}(G, A')$ with a subset of $\textrm{Hom}(G, A)$.

Suppose $A'' \to A'$ is another monomorphism. Then we get a chain of subsets $$\textrm{Hom}(G, A'') \subseteq \textrm{Hom}(G, A') \subseteq \textrm{Hom}(G, A)$$ and the definition of strong generator implies that $\textrm{Hom}(G, A'') = \textrm{Hom}(G, A')$ if and only if $A'' \to A$ and $A' \to A$ are isomorphic as subobjects of $A$. But what if $A' \to A$ and $A'' \to A$ are not comparable? Well, then take their pullback (which exists in any abelian category) and then use that as a bridge to compare $A' \to A$ and $A'' \to A$. The conclusion is, $\textrm{Hom}(G, A') = \textrm{Hom}(G, A'')$ as subsets of $\textrm{Hom}(G, A)$ if and only if $A' \to A$ and $A'' \to A$ are isomorphic as subobjects of $A$.

In particular, since $\textrm{Hom}(G, A)$ only has a set of subsets, $A$ only has a set of (isomorphism classes of) subobjects.

  • $\begingroup$ Is it true that a Grothendieck category always has a strong generator? I'm just asking because I am sure I read somewhere that a Grothendieck category is always well-powered $\endgroup$ Jan 14 '13 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ Middle of this page: books.google.co.uk/… $\endgroup$ Jan 14 '13 at 17:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ One definition of Grothendieck category asks that there be a generator. Since Grothendieck categories are locally small and cocomplete, by the remarks here, any generator is automatically a strong generator. $\endgroup$
    – Zhen Lin
    Jan 14 '13 at 18:00

I'm not sure if the answer below is more well-suited to be a comment or as an answer, but I think that it might be helpful to include a short proof that in the setting of Freyd's book that the assertion can be proved directly without assuming that $G$ is strong. (but may only work in abelian categories)

Case 1 : Comparable Objects

By the definition of a generator (not necessarily strong), we see that the functor $\operatorname{Hom}(G,-)$ is left exact and faithful. For clarity, let us call this functor $F$.

Suppose we are given a proper inclusion $A'\rightarrow A$, we may extend the inclusion to an exact sequence $0\rightarrow A'\rightarrow A\rightarrow A''\rightarrow 0$ and apply the functor $F$.

If we were to have an exact sequence $0\rightarrow FA'\rightarrow FA\rightarrow 0$ then one concludes by faithfulness of $F$ that $A\rightarrow A''$ is just $0$ and get a contradiction. This shows that $FA'$ is a proper subset of $FA$ whenever $A'$ is a proper subset of $A$.

Case 2 : Incomparable Objects

This is done in Zhen Lin's answer.

(To be more precise : one can show that $F$ "commutes with" $\cap$ in some sense)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.