1
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a $k$-alegbra and $B$ be its field of fractions. Suppose $\{\frac{f_{1}}{g_{1}},...,\frac{f_{n}}{g_{n}}\}$ is an algebraically independent set in B. Question: Are there $n$ algebraically independent elements in A?

I can show that either $f_{i}$ or $g_{i}$ is algebraically independent for each of the fractions, using facts about field extensions. So suppose each $f_{i}$ is algebraically independent in $A$. Does this imply that $\{f_{1},...,f_{n}\}$ is an algebraically independent set in $A$? If not, how can I show that there are at least $n$ algebraically independent elements in A? My two ideas are (1) use linear combinations of the $f_{i}$, and (2) successively choose different fractions in B that guarantee that $\{f_{1},...,f_{n}\}$ is algebraically independent. I am not sure how to go about proving that either of these two ways actually works.

I believe some of the comments of the following are relevant: Extension of residue fields and algebraic independence

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Let $T=\{f_1,\dots,f_n,g_1,\dots,g_n\}$. Replacing $A$ by $k[T]$ and $B$ by $k(T)$, we may assume $A$ is generated by $T$.

Now let $S\subseteq T$ be a maximal algebraically independent subset of $T$. By maximality of $S$, every element of $T$ is algebraic over $k(S)$, and hence so is every element of $B$, since $B$ is generated by $T$ as a field extension of $k(S)$. So $S$ is a transcendence basis for $B$ over $k$. But since $\{\frac{f_{1}}{g_{1}},...,\frac{f_{n}}{g_{n}}\}$ is algebraically independent, $B$ has transcendence degree at least $n$ over $k$. It follows that $S$ has at least $n$ elements.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why does k(T) being algebraic over k(S) imply S is a transcendence basis of B? $\endgroup$ – SihOASHoihd May 20 '18 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ That's the definition of a transcendence basis? An algebraically independent set over which the field is algebraic? $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey May 20 '18 at 21:22
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose T is an algebraically independent subset of a field F/k such that F is not algebraic over k(T). How does this imply that T can be extended to a larger algebraically independent set? $\endgroup$ – SihOASHoihd May 20 '18 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ Take any element of $F$ which is not algebraic over $k(T)$, and add it to $T$. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey May 20 '18 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah I guess I answered my own question. $\endgroup$ – SihOASHoihd May 20 '18 at 21:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.