0
$\begingroup$

Let U be an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$ and let K be a compact subset of U. Suppose that f : U → R is a function of class $\mathbb{C}^1$(U) -continuously differentiable in U- and let $\Bbb E = \{(x, y)\in K \mid f(x, y) = 0 \}$ and that Df -jacobian of f- does not vanish on E. Investigate whether E is a Jordan region.

Since determinant of the jacobian matrix of f is not equal to zero in E, initially it came to my mind to use the inverse function theorem. Let's define F(x,y)=( f(x,y), 1) for any $(x,y) \in U$. F is continuously differentiable. Since for any $(x,y) \in E$ the jacobian of f is different than zero, then (by inverse function theorem) there is an open set W containing E such that F is injective on W and $F^{-1}$ is continuously differentiable on F(W). Thus E$ \subseteq$W, E=$F^{-1}((0,1))$ and (0,1) is a point of volume zero. Due to the fact that $F^{-1}$ is continuously differentiable on a compact set K, $E\subseteq K$, then for any region of volume zero its image under $F^{-1}$ will be zero, i.e., E=$F^{-1}((0,1))$ is of volume zero.

Is this proof sufficient? I have some doubts especially about showing that image of (0,1) under F$^{-1}$ is equal to E.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Investigate whether E is a Jordan region." Did you mean Jordan curve? $\endgroup$ – zhw. May 17 '18 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ Actually I don't know whether a Jordan curve implies a Jordan region, but a Jordan region is bounded set whose boundary can be covered by arbitrarily small rectangles:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1251627/jordan-region-problem $\endgroup$ – Osman Bulut May 17 '18 at 16:27
0
$\begingroup$

Note that the set $E:=\bigl\{(x,y)\in K\,\bigm|\,f(x,y)=0\bigr\}$ is not a two-dimensional region, but generically a curve. It seems that your question is the following: Can this curve bound a certain Jordan measurable region?

Note that your $f$ is a scalar function, hence the derivative $df(p)$ is a linear functional at each point $p\in U$, and should not be viewed as a "Jacobian". Usually $df(p)$ is realized as gradient vector $$\nabla f(p)=\bigl(f_x(p),f_y(p)\bigr)\ .$$ I'm interpreting the phrase "that Df -jacobian of f- does not vanish on E" in your question as assumption that $df(p)\ne0$ for all $p\in E$, which is the same thing as $\nabla f(p)\ne{\bf 0}$ for all $p\in E$. This implies that each point $p\in E$ is the center of a rectangular window $W$ such that $E\cap W$ is graph of a $C^1$ function $y=\phi(x)$ or $x=\psi(y)$. This, together with the compactness of $E$, allows to conclude that $E$ is the union of finitely many simply closed curves. It may be that $E$ bounds a Jordan region in your sense, but this is not necessarily the case. Consider the example $$f(x,y):=\cos(x^2+y^2)\qquad\bigl((x,y)\in{\mathbb R}^2\bigr)$$ and $K$ the closed disc of radius $\sqrt{4\pi}$ centered at the origin.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your effort! But in the question it is not assumed that $\nabla f(p)\ne{\bf 0}$ on $K$, but instead $\nabla f(p)\ne{\bf 0}$ on $E\subseteq K$. This makes your argument in the last paragraph flawed. $\endgroup$ – Osman Bulut May 17 '18 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.