3
$\begingroup$

I came up with one question while trying to solve an exercise in algebraic geometry.

Let $A$ be a local ring with maximal ideal $m$, a prime ideal $p$, and the fraction field $K$. There is a valuation ring $R$ which dominates $A$ (and maximal with domination). Since $A_p$ is also a local ring, there is a valuation ring $R'$ which dominates $A_p$. Now my question is, can we show that the ring R is contained in R' as the ring $A$ is contained in $A_p$? In the original context, $A$ is a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$.

Let me explain a little bit why I'm concerning this problem. It's from Ex. 4.5 (c) of algebraic geometry by Hartshorne.

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ with function field $K$. Suppose, for any valuation of $K/k$, there exists a unique center $x$ of $X$, i.e. there exists a unique point $x$ of $X$ with the domination between local ring $\mathcal{O}_{x,X}$. Then $X$ is proper over $k$.

The given hyphothesis says that the valuative criterion for properness hold for a function field $K$ and its valuation ring $R$. However, to show the properness, we should consider other field $L$ and its valuation ring $S$.

A map from $\mathrm{Spec}L$ to $X$ factor through a closed subscheme $\{x_0\}^-$ with a reduced induced structure where $x_0$ is the image of the $\xi_0 \in \mathrm{Spec}L$. Then we should find a map from $\mathrm{Spec}S$ for a valuation ring $S$ in $L$. The residue field $k(x_0)$ is contained in $L$, and $\mathcal{O}_{x_0 ,X} \twoheadrightarrow k(x_0)$ gives a pull back of valuation on $\mathcal{O}_{x_0, X}$. Then we can find a local subring $T\subset\mathcal{O}_{x_0 ,X} $ with this valuation. Since $T \subset K$, there is a valuation ring $R$ dominates $T$. Then by the assumption, $R$ has a unique center $x_1$ which must be a specialization of $x_0$, but I can't prove this yet. However, if $R$ is also a subring of the valuation ring $R'$ dominating $\mathcal{O}_{x_0, X}$, then we can find a prime ideal in $\mathcal{O}_{x_1, X}$ by taking inverse image of the maximal ideal of $R'$, then we will get an inclusion from $\mathcal{O}_{x_1, X}$ to $\mathcal{O}_{x_0, X}$. Consider $x_1$ as a point in $\{x_0\}^-$, then we can see that $S$ dominates $\mathcal{O}_{x_1, \{x_0\}^-}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In your very first question, could you specify where $R$ lives in? $\endgroup$ – User0829 May 23 '18 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ @User0829 It is a subring of $K$. $\endgroup$ – HLEE May 23 '18 at 14:38
1
$\begingroup$

I don’t think so.

Let $A = k[x,y]$ and $n = (x,y)$. Take the local ring $R$ as $R = A_n, m = nR$. Then $V = k[x,y/x]_{(x)}$ is a valuation ring dominating $R$. Since $R$ is normal, $R_{(x)}$ is a valuation ring. However, $V \not\subset R_{(x)}$ as $y/x \not\in R_{(x)}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $k[x,y]$ is not a local ring. $\endgroup$ – User0829 May 23 '18 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ @User0829 He is saying that $A_n$ is a local ring. $\endgroup$ – HLEE May 23 '18 at 14:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.