0
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to prove that the endomorphism ring of a supersingular curve is indeed an order in a quaternion algebra over $Q$. I have been following in the lines of Silverman's proof which goes more or less in the following way:

Proof: Suppose by contradiction that $End(E)$ is not an order in a quaternion algebra over $Q$. As a consequence $$ \mathcal{K}:= End(E)\otimes Q $$ is either $Q$ or an imaginary quadratic extension of $Q$.

Because $E$ is a supersingular elliptic curve there are only finitely many elliptic curves (up to $\overline{F}_{p^{n}}$-isomorphism) isogenous to $E$.

Let $\ell Z$ be a prime with $\ell \neq p$ such that $\ell$ is a prime element in $End(E')$ (the order of an imaginary quadratic extension or $Q$) for every elliptic curve $E'$ isogenous to $E$. Because there are only finitely many such subrings $End(E')\subset \mathcal{K}$, it is clear such a prime exists.

Because $E[\ell^{i}]\subset E(\overline{K})$ and $$ E[\ell^{i}] \simeq Z_{\ell^{i}}\times Z_{\ell^{i}} $$ there exists a sequence of subgroups $$ S_{1}\subset S_{2} \subset \cdots \subset E(\overline{K}), \quad \text{ where } S_{i}\simeq Z_{\ell^{i}}. $$ we know there exists a (unique up to $\overline{F}_{p^{n}}$-isomorphism) isogeny $\varphi_{i} \colon E \to E/S_{i}$ with kernel $S_{i}$. But since there exists an infinite number of isogenies $\varphi_{i}$ and only a finite number of elliptic curves isogenous to $E$ there must exist integers $m,k>0$ such that $E_{k+m}$ and $E_{k}$ are $F_{p^{n}}$-isomorphic. Let $\rho \colon E_{k} \to E_{k+m}$ be the natural projection with cyclic kernel $$ \ker(\rho)=S_{k+m}/S_{k} $$ of order $\ell^{m}$ and $\iota \colon E_{k+m}\to E_{k}$ the isomorphism, then the composition $$ \rho \circ \iota \colon E_{k} \to E_{k} $$ yields an endomorphism of $E_{k}$.

Now as for the question, because $\ell$ is a prime in $End(E_m)$, Silverman claims that if we compare degrees, then we must have $\rho=u \circ [\ell^{n/2}]$ for some automorphism $u$ of $E_m$? While this is not the case in general is guess this has something to do with $\ell$ been a prime in $End(E_m)$, am I missing something here or are there more than meets the eye?

I tried having a look a Deuring's original article which apparently is what Silverman used, though my germen is a bit rusty and translating engines are of no help what so ever.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Because $S_{k+m}/S_k$ is a subgroup of $E[\ell^{k+m}]$ there must exists another isogeny $\psi$ such that $\rho \circ \psi = [\ell^{k+m}]$. Now composing both isogenies with appropiate isomorphismens and enabeling the fact that $\ell$ is prime in $End(E_k)$ we find that $\iota \circ \rho = u \circ [\ell^x]$ for some integer $x$, the rest follows from comparing degrees, as stated by Silverman.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.