5
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\Cof}{\operatorname{cof}} \newcommand{\id}{\operatorname{Id}}$ Let $V$ be a real oriented $d$-dimensional vector space ($d>2$). Let $2 \le k \le d-1$ be fixed.

Consider the following map: $$\psi:\text{GL}^+(V) \to \text{GL}(\bigwedge^{k}V,\bigwedge^{k}V) \, \,, \, \, \psi(A)=\bigwedge^{k}A,$$

where $\bigwedge^{k} V$ is the $k$-th exterior power of $V$.

Is $\psi$ an immersion?

Note that $\psi$ is injective and smooth. My motivation is connected to this question.

Edit:

Here are some observations: First, using the multiplicative nature of $\psi$, we can reduce everything to the identity. (Since $d\psi_A(B)=\psi(A) \circ d\psi_{\id}(A^{-1}B)$).

Let's consider for a moment the case $k=2$: In that case $$ \big(d\psi_{\id}(B)\big)(e_i \wedge e_j)=e_i \wedge Be_j+Be_i \wedge e_j. \tag{1}$$

So, we have reduced the question into showing that if equation $(1)$ holds for every two vectors $e_i,e_j$, then $B=0$. (Of course, it suffices to take $e_i,e_j$ to be part of a given basis for $V$).

I have also proved that $\text{trace} B=0$ (In general $d\psi_A(B)=0 \Rightarrow \langle \Cof A,B \rangle=0$ and $\Cof A=\id$).

Since the answer is positive for $k=d-1$ (see explanation below), we see that the first non-obvious case is $k=2,d=4$.


A proof the answer is positive for $k=d-1$:

In that case $\bigwedge^{d-1}A$ is essentially the cofactor matrix of $A$, $\Cof A$. Then we have the following formula for its derivative:

$$d(\Cof)_A(B) = (A^{T})^{-1}\big(\langle \Cof A , B\rangle \cdot \id - B^T \circ \Cof A \big),$$

so $d(\Cof)_A(B)=0$ implies $\langle \Cof A , B\rangle \cdot \id = B^T \circ \Cof A$. Taking traces we get $$d \langle \Cof A , B\rangle = \langle \Cof A , B\rangle \Rightarrow \langle \Cof A , B\rangle =0,$$ which in turn implies $$ B^T \circ \Cof A =0 \Rightarrow B=0.$$

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ If a morphism $\psi$ of Lie groups is injective then the tangent map at the origin is also injective ( $d\psi(X)=0$ implies $\phi(\exp X)=e$.). $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi May 10 '18 at 13:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ your map is only locally injective if both $n$ and $k$ are even ($A$, $-A$ map to the same operator), but the conclusion still holds for the tangent map at the origin. $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi May 10 '18 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ Hmmm... you are absolutely right. I need to be more careful here. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Shachar May 10 '18 at 18:27
  • $\begingroup$ It is not a problem though, since locally it is injective, and that guarantees that you have an inverse locally, enough for smoothness. For instance, $e^{i\phi(t)}$ smooth implies $\phi$ smooth, since we have a local inverse for $e^{ix}$. $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi May 10 '18 at 18:35
4
$\begingroup$

Note that $\psi(A \circ B) = \psi(A) \circ \psi(B);$ so $\psi$ is a homomorphism of Lie groups.

Proposition. Any injective Lie group morphism $\psi : G \to H$ is an immersion.

Proof. Since $\exp_H \circ D\psi_\mathrm{id} = \psi \circ \exp_G$ and exponential maps are diffeomorphisms near the identity, injectivity of $\psi$ implies injectivity of $D\psi_\mathrm{id}.$ By homogeneity we conclude that $D\psi$ is injective everywhere.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ the map in question may only be locally injective but your argument takes care of that too. I guess the OP would very much like an explicit inverse map ( find the elements of a matrix given the $k\times k$ minors, up to a constant), interesting what those formulas would be $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi May 10 '18 at 14:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.