I have some troubles with a problem, I`ve been dealing for a while, so i hope you can help me. :)

I need to show, that, if $G \subset \mathbb{C}$ is a Domain and $ \gamma : [0,1] \rightarrow G$ is a closed path, then $\gamma$ is FEP-null-homotopic if and only if it is free-null-homotopic.

First I will explain the phrases, as we defined it.

Two paths are (FEP-)homotopic, if there exists a continous map $h: [0,1] \times [0,1] \rightarrow G$, such that both of the paths have the same beginning- and the same end-Point. A closed path is called (FEP-)null-homotopic, if it is in the same equivalence-class (formed by the homotopy-relation) as it's start point. This means, that we can shrink the path to it's start-point with this map.

Two closed paths $\gamma, \eta$ are free-homotopic, if the continous map $h: [0,1] \times [0,1] \rightarrow G$ holds $h(0,\tau) = h(1, \tau)$ and $h(.,0)=\gamma$ and $h(.,1)=\eta$

Now after giving all these definitions, I'll explain my thoughts (please correct me, if I'm misstaking):

FEP-null-homotopic means, that the paths can shrink to a point, wheareas the starting (=end)point is fixed. Free-homotopic means, that this point is allowed to be translated in the $\mathbb{C}$-plane.

So I suppose the "$\Rightarrow$" - direction should be finished, due to we have the special-case of a free homotopy without translation.

For the "$\Leftarrow$"-direction I think I need to show, that for each pair of free-homotopic paths there exists a continous map between them, which is homotopic. This should be possible via "moving along" with the corresponding point. The movement/translation of this point is continous, because the free-homotopic map $h$ is continous, so it is also continous for fixed $t$ in the second argument (I think this describes the "movement" of my fixed point.)

So I suppose it should be possible to create such a map, which "deletes" the movement, such that we get the wanted homotopic map.

Well, this has been my idea for a possible solution. My Problem is, that I don't know how to make a feasible proof out of that (providing, that my idea is right) and how to define the claimed homotopy.

I hope some of you can help me! :)

Thanks!

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.