Both theorems assume the same condition and conclusion, except that

Since a field of subsets is also a ring of subsets, is Hahn-Kolmogorov theorem a direct result of Carathéodory's extension theorem?


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hahn-Kolmogorov could be seen as the small brother to Caratheodory, that is it is slightly more direct but for the price of requiring a little bit more assumptions and getting less further... Moreover, Caratheodory is sort of an upgrade of the idea of Hahn-Kolmogorov. $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Sep 7 '14 at 2:14
  • $\begingroup$ Does anyone know which paper(s) first introduced the Hahn-Kolmogorov Theoremm? $\endgroup$ – user109871 Aug 4 '18 at 17:18

It will depend, of course, on exactly how the theorems are stated. In his book Introduction to Measure Theory, Tao states the Carathéodory theorem first (1.7.3) but for outer measures, and then uses this to prove the Hahn-Kolmogorov theorem (1.7.8) for premeasures. However, as the proof to 1.7.8. shows, he has to do slightly more than just apply the Carathéodory's extension theorem s he has stated it to obtain the second result.

As everyone knows, though, different authors often use the same name for different results. The Wikipedia articles seem to be particularly confusing about the difference between the two theorems. Perhaps the Wikipedia articles were written by different people who learned from different texts; that is always an issue with comparing different articles on Wikipedia.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.