# Maximal subgroups of finite group [closed]

Are the maximal subgroups of a finite group always conjugate? Suppose that $H$ is a maximal subgroup of $G$. Consider a subgroup $H$ conjugate to any element of $G$, this subgroup has the same order as $H$, hence max is maximal and all maximal subgroups are conjugate. Is this reasoning correct?

## closed as off-topic by Shaun, Leucippus, JMP, Isaac Browne, Claude LeiboviciMay 7 '18 at 10:08

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Shaun, Leucippus, JMP, Isaac Browne, Claude Leibovici
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Consider the group $S_4$. Then, $A_4$ and $S_3$ are maximal subgroups of $S_4$ but they have different orders. – Moritz May 6 '18 at 20:00
• Smallest counterexample is $S_3$; the maximal subgroups are the proper subgroups, one of order $3$ and three of order $2$; the latter cannot be conjugate to the former. In addition, if all maximal subgroups were conjugate, then you would never be able to have a normal maximal subgroup unless the maximal subgroup were a unique maximal subgroup... and the only finite groups with a unique maximal subgroup are cyclic of prime power order. Finally, maximality is not determined by the order. So, “not just no, but hell no.” – Arturo Magidin May 7 '18 at 0:53