3
$\begingroup$

Can you prove that $\ln{x} \leq \frac{4x}{x + 4}$ for $\forall x > 0$? I can't. I tried using the inequality $\ln{x} \leq x - 1$ as follows:

$$\begin{align} x - 1 & \leq \frac{4x}{x+4} \\ x^2 + 3x - 4 & \leq 4x \\ x^2 - x - 4 & \leq 0 \\ x(x - 1) - 4 & \leq 0 \end{align}$$ so I can prove it for $0 < x < 3$, but I can't get any closer.

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Since log is unbounded, and that fraction is approximately $4$ for large $x$, I don't think you can prove such a thing. $\endgroup$ – Joppy May 3 '18 at 23:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This inequality is certainly false if $x \ge e^4$, since then $\log x \ge 4$ but $\frac{4x}{x+4} < 4$. $\endgroup$ – Hans Engler May 3 '18 at 23:58
3
$\begingroup$

The inequality is not valid for large values of $x$.

For example, let $x=100$, then $$\ln{x} \leq \frac{4x}{x + 4}$$

turns into $$4.605\le \frac {400}{104}=3.841$$

Which is not true.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Easier to just say that $\frac{4x}{x+4}<\frac{4x+16}{x+4}=4.$ And $\log x>4$ for $x>e^4.$ $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews May 4 '18 at 0:48
  • $\begingroup$ The power of counter examples! $\endgroup$ – imranfat May 4 '18 at 1:03
  • $\begingroup$ At the same times LHS is unbounded while RHS has limit $4$ so this was unavoidable... Maybe the exercise is to prove the inequality for let say $0<x<36$. $\endgroup$ – zwim May 4 '18 at 1:04
  • $\begingroup$ @Thomas Andrews I should have seen that. Incidentally, is the similar inequality $\frac{x}{\ln{x}} \lt \frac{x+6}{4}$ just as invalid? $\endgroup$ – cschultz2048 May 4 '18 at 2:27
  • $\begingroup$ $\frac{x}{\ln{x}} \lt \frac{x+6}{4}$ is not valid for $x=4$. It is valid for large values of $x$. I $\endgroup$ – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani May 4 '18 at 2:34
1
$\begingroup$

Consider the function $$f(x)=\frac{4 x}{x+4}-\log (x)$$ When $x$ is large, by Taylor, $$f(x)=4-\frac{16}{x}-\log (x)+O\left(\frac{1}{x^2}\right)$$ and the zero of it is given in terms of Lambert function $$x=-\frac{16}{W\left(-\frac{16}{e^4}\right)}$$ Since the argument is small, we can use for the evaluation of $W(t)$ $$W(t)=t-t^2+\frac{3 t^3}{2}-\frac{8 t^4}{3}+\frac{125 t^5}{24}+O\left(t^6\right)$$ giving $x\approx 35.746$ while the exact solution would be $36.934$.

For $x=37$, $f(x)=\frac{148}{41}-\log (37)\approx -0.00116$ and then the inequality does not hold anymore.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Hint: In the interval $x>0$, the LHS is increasing without bound, while the RHS is increasing with the bound $4$ (the horizontal asymptote $y=4$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.