What is the intuition behind this triangle inequality "trick"? Sometimes in proofs related to limits I see the use of something like this: $$|a-b| = \mathbf{|(a-c)+(c-b)|} \leq |a-c|+|c-b|.$$
What is the logic of doing such thing apart from the reason that it just works?
Edit: An example:

 A: What is the intuition behind this triangle inequality “trick”?
For the context of limits, I would say

To ensure that the base of a triangle is small, it is enough to ensure that the other two sides are small.


For example, in the said context, we usually want to show that $|f(x)-L|$ is small (less than $\varepsilon$), provided that a certain condition is satisfied (usually, provided that $x$ runs over a small interval). The way we can do this is by showing that the "sides" $|f(x)-c|$ and $|c-L|$ are small (both at most $\varepsilon/2$), for some suitable $c$ (which usually depends on $x$ and whose relation with $f(x)$ and $L$ is known).
A: The idea is that you'd like to bound the distance between $a$ and $b$, but you know that they're both less than a certain distance away from some $c$.
So, they can't be too far apart, since they're both 'close' to $c$.
A: Well, this is a proof that the "straight" distance between $P$ and $Q$ will always be less or equal to any sum of distances between any intermediary points between $P$ and $Q$. 
In proofs about limits presumably you might know stuff about $|a-c|$ and $|c-b|$ but not between $a$ and $b$.
Without context this is a pretty vague question.
