6
$\begingroup$

Consider the following sequence:

$$ T_{1} = a,\: T_{i+1} = F_{T_{i}} $$

where $ a \in \mathbb{P} $ and $F_i$ is the $i$-th Fibonacci number.

Is there a value of $a \neq 5$ such that this sequence generates only primes?

I certainly don't expect an answer in the positive—as it would prove that there are infinitely many Fibonacci primes, which is an open problem—but I would like to know if there are any straightforward/obvious reasons for which such an $a$ wouldn't exist.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The question seems to contain a typo. $\endgroup$ – Peter May 3 '18 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ Not the formulation is the problem. I do not understand the sequence. $\endgroup$ – Peter May 3 '18 at 9:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see @Peter; the intention is that the sequence begins by taking some prime number $a$, determines the next term as the a-th Fibonacci number $F_{a}$, and then uses that Fibonacci number as the index for the following term $F_{F_{a}}$ and so on. For example, taking $a = 7$, $T_{1} = 7$, $T_{2} = F_{7} = 13$, and $T_{3} = F_{13} = 233$. $\endgroup$ – aghostinthefigures May 3 '18 at 9:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK, I understand. And you want to show that every such sequence must contain at least one composite number. $\endgroup$ – Peter May 3 '18 at 9:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Precisely, and I exclude $a = 5$ since that sequence would consist entirely of $5$'s as a result of $F_{5} = 5$. $\endgroup$ – aghostinthefigures May 3 '18 at 10:17

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.