If $d$ is the missing degree, the Handshaking Lemma implies that $1+2+3+4+5+6+7+d=28+d$ is even, so $d$ is even. Since the degree-$7$ vertex is adjacent to it, $d>0$ and thus $d \in \{2,4,6\}$.
If $d=6$, then the vertex of degree $7$ (which is adjacent to all other vertices) and the two vertices of degree $6$ (which are adjacent all all other vertices, except the degree-$1$ vertex) are adjacent to the vertex of degree $2$, giving a contradiction.
If $d=2$, then the vertices of degrees $6$ and $7$ are adjacent to both of the two vertices of degree $2$, and the vertex of degree $5$ is adjacent to one of the vertices of degree $2$, giving a contradiction.
If $d=4$, then the graph below has degree sequence $(1,2,3,4,4,5,6,7)$:

(I mark the vertices with their degrees. I also give it a $5$-coloring.)
Actually, it's unique up to isomorphism.
The vertices of degrees $4,4,5,6,7$ induce a $K_5$, so it's not planar by Kuratowski's theorem (or Wagner's theorem), and its chromatic number is not less than $5$. I also give it a $5$-coloring, so its chromatic number is $5$.
In fact, computing it chromatic polynomial, we get $$x(x-1)^2(x-2)^2(x-3)^2(x-4).$$ By substituting in $x=5$, we count $2880$ distinct $5$-colorings.
This can be checked by hand: there are $x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)$ ways to $x$-color the $K_5$, then, since the yet-to-be-colored vertices are only adjacent to vertices in the $K_5$, the degree-$3$ vertex is colored using $x-3$ colors, the degree-$2$ vertex is colored using $x-2$ colors, and the degree-$1$ vertex is colored using $x-1$ colors.