10
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be an invertible, diagonalizable matrix and let $V$ be the space of $n \times n$ matrices. Define $T\colon V\to V$ be $T(X)=A^{-1}XA$. Find the eigenvalues, minimal, and characteristic polynomial of $T$.

I think I have what the eigenvalues could be. If we let $A=QDQ^{-1}$, where $D$ is diagonal with entries $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n$ , then $T(X)=\lambda X$ is equivalent to $D^{-1}ZD=\lambda Z$, where $Z=Q^{-1}XQ$. Hence, comparing entries on the left and right, I get that $\lambda z_{ii}=z_{ii}$ for each $i$, and if $i\not=j$, $\lambda z_{ij}=\frac{\lambda_j}{\lambda_i}z_{ij}$. So the possible eigenvalues for $T$ are $\lambda=1$ or $\lambda=\frac{\lambda_j}{\lambda_i}$, $i\not=j$.

From here though, I don't see how to find the minimal or characteristic polynomial of $T$.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As you can exhibit $n^2$ eigenvectors, $T$ is diagonalizable, and the product of all linear factors $(x-\lambda)$ is the characteristic polynomial, whereas the minimal polynomial is obtained by dropping repeated factors from this $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Apr 27 '18 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ @HagenvonEitzen Could you explain why there $n^2$ independent eigenvectors? It seems $T$ can have at most $n^2-n+1$ distinct eigenvalues (if $\lambda_j/\lambda_i\not=1$ for all $i\not=j)$. But I don't see how you get $n^2$ eigenvectors? $\endgroup$ – Tom Chalmer Apr 27 '18 at 22:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the case when $A$ is diagonal is it is easy to write down $n^2$ independent eigenvectors. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Apr 29 '18 at 22:00
  • $\begingroup$ @DerekHolt since $\lambda z_{ij}=\frac{\lambda_j}{\lambda_i}z_{ij}$ if $i\not=j$, and $\lambda z_{ii}=z_ii$, would the $n^2$ eigenvectors just be the standard basis vectors for the nxn matrices? That is, $E_{ij}$ being the matrix that is $1$ in the ij place and $0$ everywhere else? $\endgroup$ – Tom Chalmer Apr 29 '18 at 22:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes that's what I had in mind! You can then conjugate them by $Q$ to get the eigenvectors for the original $A$. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Apr 30 '18 at 7:31
1
$\begingroup$

Indeed, those are the eigenvalues. In fact, $T$ is equivalent to the linear map $(A^T\otimes A^{-1})\mbox{vec}(X)$. Thus, the Jordan form consists of $1$-by-$1$ blocks (as $A$ is diagonalizable) and the eigenvalues are $\lambda_i\lambda_j^{-1}$ for all $i,j=1,\ldots,n$. Hence, the characteristic polynomial is $p(z)=(z-1)^n\prod_{i\neq j}(z-\lambda_i\lambda_j^{-1})$. To get the minimal polynomial, remove the repeating factors in $p(z)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, i'm not super familiar with the tensor notation. Could you explain what that part means? $\endgroup$ – Tom Chalmer Apr 27 '18 at 22:18
0
$\begingroup$

A possible way to show that those are the eigenvalues is to exibit the matrix of T.

It is useful to first note that the function $T(X)=AXA^{-1}$ is equivalent to $S(X)=DAD^{-1}$, in fact $$T(X)= Q D Q^{-1} X Q D^{-1} Q^{-1} = \beta_{Q} \circ S \circ \beta_{Q^{-1}}(X) $$ where $\beta_Q(X) = Q X Q^{-1}$ is an invertible linear map with determinant one.

We can now study $S$.

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be the canonical basis of $V$, space of the $n \times n$ matrices, ordered by columns.

The matrices of $L_{D^{-1}}(X) = D^{-1}X$ and $R_{D}(X)=XD$ in the basis $\mathcal{E}$ are easily shown by direct computation to be diagonal. Denoting with $l_k$ the $k$-th element on the diagonal of the first matrix and $r_k$ the $k$-th element on the diagonal of the second we have $l_{ni+j} = \frac{1}{\lambda _j}$ and $r_{ni+j}= \lambda_i$ for each $i,j \in \{1,..,n\}$ .

The matrix of $S$ is their product, wich is diagonal with entries of the form $s _{ni+j} = \frac{\lambda_i}{\lambda_j}$. The charateristic polinomial is then as follows: $$ p_S(x)= \prod_{\substack{1 \leq i \leq n \\ 1 \leq j \leq n }} (x - \frac{\lambda_i}{\lambda_j})$$ The minimal is the same with repeating factors removed.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The OP asks for a detailed proof of $spectrum(T)=(\lambda_i/\lambda_j)$; you prove only that each eigenvalue is in this form, which is clear. $\endgroup$ – loup blanc May 4 '18 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ @loupblanc I added the exact form of the matrices that fully determines the spectrum. Let me know if it clarifies and if you have any suggestion to improve the exposition. $\endgroup$ – Dario May 5 '18 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ OK. Now your proof is complete. $\endgroup$ – loup blanc May 6 '18 at 10:34
0
$\begingroup$

The @chhro 's answer is correct (I upvoted it). We can add that follows:

$A,A^{-1},A^T$ are diagonalizable. Let $spectrum(A)=(\lambda_i)$ and let $(u_i)$ be an associated eigen-basis of $A$, $(v_i)$ be an associated eigen-basis of $A^T$. Then $A^{-1}u_i=\dfrac{1}{\lambda_i}u_i$ and $v_j^TA=\lambda_jv_j^T$.

Note that $\mathcal{B}=(u_iv_j^T)_{i,j}$ has $n^2$ elements and is a basis of $M_n$. Moreover, $T(u_iv_j^T)=\dfrac{\lambda_j}{\lambda_i}u_iv_j^T$ and therefore $\mathcal{B}$ is a basis of eigenvectors of $T$ and $spectrum(T)=(\lambda_j/\lambda_i)_{i,j}$.

Conclusion: $T$ is diagonalizable, its characteristic polynomial is $p(x)=\Pi_{i,j}(x-\lambda_i/\lambda_j)$ and its minimal polynomial is constituted by the product of distinct terms of $p(x)$.

EDIT to @Tom Chalmer . The OP offers a bounty for a detailed answer to his above question. He obtains three answers, two absolutely complete, including that of @Dario . Not only does he not give the promised bounty but he does not upvote any answer and he did not deign to write any comment for two of the answers.

I find this attitude very contemptuous and therefore absolutely inadmissible.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.