1
$\begingroup$

This is the question I am working on : identify a largest subcollection of linearly independent vectors and express all the remaining vectors as linear combinations of the vectors in the subcollection. (a) [4 points] $v_1 = (5, 2, −3, 1)$, $v_2 = (4, 1, −2, 3)$, $v_3 = (1, 1, −1, −2)$, $v_4 = (3, 4, −1, 2)$, $v_5 = (7, −6, −7, 0)$;

The method I found from one of the stack exchange posts :

  1. Put vectors as COLUMNS in a matrix
  2. Find RREF
  3. Identify non-pivotal columns in RREF matrix and then the corresponding columns in the original matrix are the linearly independent ones.

This works!

But I tried to do this by : 1.Putting vectors as ROWS in a matrix 2.Find RREF 3.Identify non-pivotal rows in RREF and then the corresponding rows in the original matrix are the linearly independent ones.

But I'm getting a wrong set here. What Am I doing wrong? : While doing the RREF, I did permute rows, I am assuming that is the problem here. However, then I should have done Reduced Column Echelon Form right? But I have read that RREF = (RCEF)transpose.

Thoughts: RREF=RCEF transpose works only for the same matrix so if I put vectors as columns, I should do RREF and if as rows then RCEF. Am I right?

Thank you

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to MSE. Please use MathJax $\endgroup$ – user539887 Apr 27 '18 at 8:06
1
$\begingroup$

It depends on what you’re trying to accomplish. Row-reduction produces a basis for the row space of a matrix $M$, but there’s in general no correlation between the resulting non-zero rows and the original rows of the matrix, aside from their spans being equal. This should be fairly obvious since all of the zero rows appear at the bottom of the reduced matrix, but there’s no reason to believe that the first $\operatorname{rank}M$ rows in the original are linearly independent.

On the other hand, it changes the column space—the resulting pivot columns do not in general span the original column space, but they do indicate which columns in the original matrix are linearly independent, hence are a basis for the column space.

So, if you need to pick out a linearly-independent subset of a set of vectors, assemble them as columns of a matrix and row-reduce it. If, on the other hand, you just need to find a basis for their span, you can assemble a matrix with these vectors as either columns or rows and row-reduce, although you’ll get a “nicer” basis if you make them rows. All of this applies to column-reduction as well, but with the roles of rows and columns swapped.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.