1
$\begingroup$

Let $M,N$ and $P$ be $R$-modules. Then

$$(M \otimes_R N) \otimes_ R P \simeq M \otimes_R (N \otimes_R P).$$

The proof of the above as given in the lecture note given by our instructor is as follows $:$

The map $(M \otimes_R N) \times P \longrightarrow M \otimes_R (N \otimes_R P)$ given by

$$(x \otimes y , z) \mapsto x \otimes (y \otimes z)$$

is a well defined $R$-bilinear map on $(M \otimes_R N) \times P$, which can be extended to an $R$-bilinear map $(M \otimes_R N) \otimes_R P \longrightarrow M \otimes_R (N \otimes_R P)$ given by

$$(x \otimes y) \otimes z \mapsto x \otimes (y \otimes z).$$

This is an isomorphism with inverse given by $x \otimes (y \otimes z) \mapsto (x \otimes y) \otimes z$ defined similarly.

Now I am trying to prove the well-definedness of the first map i.e. the map $(M \otimes_R N) \times P \longrightarrow M \otimes_R (N \otimes_R P)$ defined by

$$(x \otimes y , z) \mapsto x \otimes (y \otimes z)$$

For this I take two elements $(x_1 \otimes y_1, z_1), (x_2 \otimes y_2, z_2) \in (M \otimes_R N) \times P$ with $(x_1 \otimes y_1, z_1) = (x_2 \otimes y_2, z_2)$. Then to show the well-definedness we must show that $x_1 \otimes (y_1 \otimes z_1) = x_2 \otimes (y_2 \otimes z_2)$. But I have failed to show that.

Would anybody please help me in this regard?

Thank you in advance.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

You need $R$ commutative here.

To show your map is well-defined, fix $z\in P$. Then $$(x,y)\mapsto x\otimes (y\otimes z)$$ is bilinear from $M\times N$ to $M\otimes(N\otimes P)$. Thus it induces a linear map from $M\otimes N$ to $M\otimes(N\otimes P)$ with $x\otimes y\mapsto x\otimes(y\otimes z)$. So $(x\otimes y,z) \mapsto x\otimes(y\otimes z)$ is well-defined from $(M\otimes N)\times P$ to $M\otimes(N\otimes P)$.

Of course the "right" way to prove this associativity is to prove that both sides are universal objects representing trilinear maps from $M\times N\times P$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Let me give some time to check them all. Then I will accept your answer. $\endgroup$ – Arnab Chatterjee. Apr 27 '18 at 6:28
  • $\begingroup$ How can I show the well-definedness of the linear map you mentioned? I first take two elements $x_1 \otimes y_1$ and $x_2 \otimes y_2$ from the generating set of $M \otimes_R N$ with $x_1 \otimes y_1 = x_2 \otimes y_2$ then how do we show that $x_1 \otimes (y_1 \otimes z) = x_2 \otimes (y_2 \otimes z)$? $\endgroup$ – Arnab Chatterjee. Apr 27 '18 at 6:52
  • $\begingroup$ The map $M ×N \longrightarrow M \otimes N$ is not always injective. Right? $\endgroup$ – Arnab Chatterjee. Apr 27 '18 at 6:55
  • $\begingroup$ So we may have $(m_1,n_1),(m_2,n_2) \in M \times N$ with $(m_1,n_1) \neq (m_2,n_2)$ but $m_1 \otimes n_1 = m_2 \otimes n_2$. $\endgroup$ – Arnab Chatterjee. Apr 27 '18 at 6:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ArnabChatterjee. Linear maps from $M\otimes N$ correspond exactly to bilinear maps from $M\times N$. This is the universal property of tensor products. $\endgroup$ – Lord Shark the Unknown Apr 27 '18 at 8:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.