Problem. I'm stuck on the following exercise from these notes on Riemannian geometry:

Determine the totally geodesic submanifolds of $\mathbb{R}P^n$.

Thoughts. I know that a submanifold $M\subseteq \mathbb{R}P^n$ is totally geodesic if and only if every geodesic in $M$ is also a geodesic in $\mathbb{R}P^n$.

I also know that every geodesic of $\mathbb{R}P^n$ can be thought of as the image of a geodesic in $S^n$ [i.e. a piece of a great circle!] under the map $\varphi\colon S^n\to \mathrm{Sym}(\mathbb{R}^{n+1})$ defined by $\varphi(p)=(2pp^\top-I)$.

This makes me think that we could perhaps somehow translate the problem into a question about the totally geodesic submanifolds of $S^n$, since $S^n$ feels more concrete than $\mathbb{R}P^n$. But at the same time, I'm not at all sure how to tackle $S^n$ either. Especially if we allow incomplete or disconnected submanifolds, it feels like there are a lot a different totally geodesic submanifolds of $S^n$ [for example any open subset of $S^n$, or unions of disjoint great circles when $n\geqslant 3$]. So perhaps thinking about $S^n$ is not at all the right approach...


If $N$ is $m$-dimensional complete totally geodesic submanifold in $\mathbb{R}P^n$, then let $p\in N$.

If $c:(-\infty,\infty)\rightarrow N$ is a geodesic in $N$, then there is a great circle $C$ in $S^n$ s.t. $c$ is a quotient of $C$.

If $X:=B(p,\epsilon)\cap N$, then consider a totally geodesic submanifold containing $X$ in $S^n$. It is $S^m$. Its quotient is totally geodesic $m$-dimensional submanifold contained in $N$. Hence it is $N$.


This is an attempt to combine HK Lee's approach with an approach suggested by a course mate. I might have missed something somewhere, so please comment if something seems unclear or plain wrong.

The idea will be to use the double-cover $\varphi\colon S^n\to \mathbb{R}P^n$ given by $\varphi(p)=[p]$, which is locally an isometry. (It is well-known that this is locally a diffeomorphism, and since it is oftentimes used to construct the metric on $\mathbb{R}P^n$, see for instance this thread, it is locally an isometry more or less by construction.) Since geodesics minimize distances locally, and $\varphi$ preserves distances locally, it is (at least intuitively) clear that $\varphi$ and $\varphi^{-1}$ will locally take geodesics to geodesics.

(1) $S^k$ (sitting in $S^n$) is a totally geodesic submanifold of $S^n$ for any $1\leqslant k\leqslant n$.

This is easy to verify. See for instance the end of Ch. 7 here.

(2) If $M^m$ is a totally geodesic submanifold of $S^n$, then $M^m$ is locally equal to $S^m$ (sitting in $S^n$).

Let $p\in M$ and let $V:=T_pM\cong \mathbb{R}^m$. It is now easy to embed $S^m$ in $S^n$ in such a way that $T_pS^m=V$. By this result, that must mean that $M$ and $S^m$ locally coincide.

(3) Let $1\leqslant k\leqslant n$ and let $S^k$ be sitting in $S^n$. Then $\varphi(S^k)$ is locally isometric to $\mathbb{R}P^k$ sitting in $\mathbb{R}P^n$.

Just choose $k$ linearly independent vectors $p_1,\ldots,p_k\in S^k\subseteq S^m\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ and form $\mathbb{R}P^k=\{[v]:v\in\mathrm{span}\{p_1,\ldots,p_k\}\setminus\{0\}\}$.

(4) For every $1\leqslant k\leqslant n$, it holds that $\mathbb{R}P^k$ (sitting in $\mathbb{R}P^n$) is a totally geodesic submanifold of $\mathbb{R}P^n$.

Every geodesic $\gamma$ in $\mathbb{R}P^k$ will (locally) correspond to a geodesic $\varphi^{-1}\circ \gamma$ in $S^k$ (sitting in $S^n$). By (1), $\varphi^{-1}\circ\gamma$ will also be a geodesic in $S^n$, and hence, $\gamma$ will be a geodesic in $\mathbb{R}P^n$.

(5) Every totally geodesic submanifold $M^m$ of $\mathbb{R}P^n$ is locally equal to $\mathbb{R}P^m$ sitting in $\mathbb{R}P^n$ .

Suppose that $M$ is a totally geodesic submanifold of $\mathbb{R}P^n$, and let $p\in M$. Then there exists some $\epsilon>0$ such that $B_\epsilon(p)\cap M$ is isometric under $\varphi^{-1}$ to a submanifold of $S^n$. Since $M$ is totally geodesic, $\varphi^{-1}(B_\epsilon(p)\cap M)$ must also be totally geodesic, and hence, by (2), locally be some embedding of $S^m$ in $S^n$. By (3), this means that $B_\epsilon(p)\cap M$ is locally $\mathbb{R}P^m$.

(4) and (5) together mean that the connected, complete totally geodesic submanifolds of $\mathbb{R}P^n$ are excactly the natural embeddings of $\mathbb{R}P^k$ in $\mathbb{R}P^n$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.