In his book Classifying spaces and classifying topoi Moerdijk proves that there exists a wieak homotopy equivalence between the classifying topos of the Haefliger space $\Gamma^q$ and that of the monoid $M(\mathbb R^q)$ of smooth embeddings of $\mathbb R^q$ into itself.

From this, he concludes that the corresponding classifying spaces $B\Gamma^q$ and $BM(\mathbb R^q)$ are weakly homotopy equivalent, using

Let $C$ be a topological category. Then there is a weak homotopy equivalence $f:Sh(BC)\to\mathcal B C$, where $\mathcal B C$ represents the classifying topos of $C$.

My problem is passing from $Sh(BC)$ to $BC$. In fact, since $BC=|Nerve(C)|$ has a base of contractible open sets (true?) its homotopy groups coincide with the étale homotopy (pro)groups of $Sh(BC)$. But the definition of weak homotopy equivalence requires the existence of a continuous function between topological spaces inducing those isomorphism in homotopy groups. So I would need some $$g:B\Gamma^q\to BM(\mathbb R^q)$$ inducing isomorphisms in homotopy, and I fail to see how to recover this from the abstract functor between the topoi of sheaves $$Sh(B\Gamma^q)\to\mathcal B \Gamma^q\to \mathcal BM(\mathbb R^q)\to Sh(BM(\mathbb R^q)).$$

Can someone give a hint? Thank you in advance.


I'll follow the terminology in the book: spaces are sober topological spaces, toposes are Grothendieck toposes, and topos morphisms are geometric morphisms.

For spaces $X,Y,$ isomorphism classes of topos morphisms $Sh(Y)\to Sh(X)$ correspond to continuous maps $Y\to X$ - see Section I.2. The end of Section I.4 gives references to Artin-Mazur for the argument that for locally contractible spaces, the topos morphism is a weak homotopy equivalence if and only if the continuous map is a weak homotopy equivalence. The local contractibility of $B\mathbb C$ follows from the paragraph after IV.2.2. (Artin-Mazur Theorem 12.1 actually assumes paracompactness as well; I'm not sure if that's a problem.)

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much. Also, is it true that the classifying spaces are CW-complexes (hence the weak equivalence can be promoted to a strong equivalence by Whitehead's theorem)? $\endgroup$ – W. Rether Jun 22 '18 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.