0
$\begingroup$

If I'm not wrong, $\lim_ {x \to 0} \sqrt{x} = 0$ , even though $\lim_ {x \to 0^{-}} \sqrt{x}$ does not exist.

Then in this following graph of $f(x)$ :

enter image description here

Does $\lim_{x \to 1} f(x)$ exist? Would it still exist if $f(1)$ were not defined?

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Since $\sqrt x$ is undefined when $x<0$, it doesn't make sense to talk about $\lim_{x\to0^-}\sqrt x$.

And, yes, $\lim_{x\to1}f(x)=1$, even if $f(1)$ is undefined.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't think $\;\lim\limits_{x\to1}f(x)\;$ is even defined as the function isn't defined on some left neighborhood of $\;x=1\;$ ... This is completely similar to $\;\lim\limits_{x\to0}\sqrt x\;$ . $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Apr 18 '18 at 9:42
  • $\begingroup$ @DonAntonio I don't understand you comment. It is defined in some interval $(1,1+\varepsilon)$. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Apr 18 '18 at 9:43
  • $\begingroup$ The same you could say about $\sqrt x$ : is is defined on the whole ray $\;[0,\infty)\;$ ...why is this case different? The limit is assumed to be taken on both sides ... What we can talk about is $\;\lim\limits_{x\to1^+} f(x)\;$ . $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Apr 18 '18 at 10:01
  • $\begingroup$ In my opinion, in order to speak about $\lim_{x\to a}f(x)$, all we need is that $a$ is an accumulation point of the domain $D_f$ of $f$. But in order to talk about $\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x)$, $a$ must be an accumulation point of $D_f\cap(a,+\infty)$ and in order to talk about $\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)$, $a$ must be an accumulation point of $D_f\cap(-\infty,a)$. $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Apr 18 '18 at 10:10
  • $\begingroup$ Accumulation point is a notion from basic topology which is, as far as I know, introduced later in analysis. As far as I know, it is usually stressed that $\;\lim\limits_{x\to a} f(x)=A\;$ if no matter how $\;x\;$ approaces $\;a\;$ ...etc. The absolute value in the definition also supports this view, otherwise we could begin with one-sided limits and then generalize the definition... $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Apr 18 '18 at 15:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.