0
$\begingroup$

Write the vector $u = (5,1,5)$ as the sum of two vectors, $v$ and $w$, such that $v \| p = (1,1,0)$ and $v ⊥ w$.

So what I did was let $v=(1,1,0)$ and $w = (5-1,1-1,5-0)$ Which is obviously wrong because i'm not using the cross product what so ever. So my assumption of $v$ must be wrong. Why is this? Or am I reading the question wrong?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Another hint: v∥p=(1,1,0) means v = k(1,1,0), where k is an arbitrary constant. $\endgroup$ – S. McGrew Apr 17 '18 at 14:24
2
$\begingroup$

Let $v$ be the orthogonal projection of $u$ on $p$, which, according to the projection theorem is given by $$ v = \frac{p \cdot u}{p \cdot p}\,p = \frac{(1,1,0)\cdot(5,1,5)}{(1,1,0)\cdot(1,1,0)}(1,1,0) = \frac{5+1+0}{1+1+0}(1,1,0) = 3(1,1,0), $$ and let $w=u-v=(5,1,5)-(3,3,0)=(2,-2,5)$.

Sanity check: $v \cdot w = (3,3,0) \cdot (2,-2,5)=0$, so indeed $v \perp w$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How do we know that when using $w=u-v$ that $v \perp w$, I see that you proved it in the end, but how did we know that is was going to be the case? $\endgroup$ – Dan D'silva Apr 17 '18 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ @DanD'silva Once you’re removed the part of $u$ that’s parallel to $p$, all that’s left is the perpendicular part. It’s a not too difficult and useful exercise to prove it in general. $\endgroup$ – amd Apr 17 '18 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ @DanD'silva: This is the essence of the projection theorem. I have added a link to the relevant Wikipedia article in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Mårten W Apr 18 '18 at 9:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.