9
$\begingroup$

It is well know that the ring of invariants of the permutation group of three elemetns $S_3$ is given by the elementary symmetric polynomials, i.e. $$\mathbb C[x,y,z]^{S_3} = \mathbb C[s_1,s_2,s_3]$$ where $$s_1 = x+y+z$$ $$s_2=xy + yz + zx$$ $$s_3= xyz.$$

Which is the ring of invariants of $A_3$, the alternating subroup of $S_3$, made of even permutations?

Of course it contains $s_1, s_2, s_3$. It also contains $$d=(x-y)(y-z)(z-x).$$ They are not algebrically independent because $d^2 \in \mathbb C[s_1,s_2,s_3]$.

How can we prove that these $4$ polynomials generate the whole ring of invariants? Which is a basis of algebrically independent generators, if any?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe try to show that the field of fractions of the ring you just produced is a degree two extension of the field of fractions of $\mathbb C[x,y,z]^{S_3}$? Then by Galois theory, you are done. $\endgroup$
    – RKD
    Apr 15 '18 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Ravi what does this theory tell us? If $[H:G]=k$ then the field of fractions of the ring of invariants under $H$ is an extension of that under $G$ of degree $k$? $\endgroup$
    – Maffred
    Apr 15 '18 at 16:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$
    – RKD
    Apr 15 '18 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "of order 2"? $\endgroup$
    – verret
    Apr 16 '18 at 1:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Right, the usual terminology is "even permutation". Because the elements of order $2$ in $S_3$ are actually odd permutations. $\endgroup$
    – verret
    Apr 16 '18 at 4:21
8
+25
$\begingroup$

Since $A_n$ is normal in $S_n$, the group $S_n$ setwise stabilizes the ring $R=\mathbf{C}[x_1,\dots,x_n]^{A_n}$ of $A_n$-invariants. Writing $S=\mathbf{C}[x_1,\dots,x_n]^{S_n}$ for the ring of symmetric polynomials, we claim that $R=S+S\delta$, where $\delta=\prod_{1 \leq i < j \leq n} (x_i-x_j)$ is the Vandermonde determinant.

Since $S_n$ acts via its quotient $S_n / A_n$ on $R$, there are two isotypes of $S_n$-representations that occur in $R$: the trivial representation and the sign representation. It follows that for $f \in R$ we have $$f=\mathrm{sym}(f)+\mathrm{alt}(f)$$ where we write "sym" and "alt" for the symmetrization and anti-symmetrization of $f$. Since every alternating polynomial is divisible by $\delta$, with quotient a symmetric polynomial, this proves our claim.

Now the ring $S$ of symmetric polynomials is generated by the elementary symmetric polynomials $e_1,\dots,e_n$ (see e.g. Chapter 1 of Macdonald's book Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials), so it follows that $R$ is generated by the Vandermonde $\delta$ and the elementary symmetric polynomials.

Finally, let $\mathfrak{m}$ be the ideal of $R$ generated by $e_1,\dots,e_n$ and $\delta$. Then $\mathfrak{m}$ is a maximal ideal (since the quotient by it is $\mathbf{C}$), but the elements $e_1,\dots,e_n$ and $\delta$ are linearly independent modulo $\mathfrak{m}^2$. It follows that $R$ is singular at $\mathfrak{m}$, and hence not a polynomial ring. Thus is cannot be generated by algebraically independent polynomials.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I missed the question about algebraically independent generators at first. I edited just now to address it. $\endgroup$
    – Stephen
    Apr 17 '18 at 17:50
4
$\begingroup$

Let $a_n$ be the dimension of the space of polynomials of degree $n$ invariant by the action of $A_3$. The formal power series $\sum_{n \ge 0} a_n t^n$ is called the Molien series of $A_3$.

You can compute it with Molien's formula, or by comparing it with the Molien series of $S_3$.

Since the ring of invariants of $S_3$ has an algebraically independant generating set given by the elementary symmetric polynomials of degrees $1,2,3$, its Molien series is $\frac 1{(1-t)(1-t^2)(1-t^3)}$.

Since the ring of invariants of $A_3$ is obtained by $S_3$'s by adding $d$ of degree $3$ whose square is invariant by $S_3$, we then have that $A_3$'s Molien series is $\frac{1+t^3}{(1-t)(1-t^2)(1-t^3)} = \frac{1-t+t^2}{(1-t)^2(1-t^3)}$.

However, a ring of polynomial with a generating set that is algebraically independent will have a Molien series of the form $\prod (1-t^{d_i})^{-1}$ where the $d_i$ are the degrees of the generators. In particular, those rational fractions never vanish for $t \in \Bbb C$.

The Molien series for $A_3$ has a zero at the roots of $1-t+t^2$, so it doesn't have an algebraically independent generating set.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.