3
$\begingroup$

I'm studying Hungerford's "Abstract Algebra - An Introduction". In its chapter 9.2 Hungerford gives an example of a characterization up to isomorphism of all finite groups of order 36. For this he uses the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups. The theorem states:

"Every finite abelian group $G$ is the direct sum of cyclic groups, each of prime power order",

where for a cyclic group with order $p^n$, we have that $p \vert m$, and $m$ is the order of $G$. The example I refer to is as follows:

"The number 36 can be written as a product of prime powers in just four ways: $36 = 2\cdot 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 3 = 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 3^2 = 2^2 \cdot 3 \cdot 3 = 2^2 \cdot 3^2$. Consequently, every abelian subgroup of order 36 must be isomorphic to one of the following groups:

$\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_3$,

$\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_9$,

$\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_3$,

$\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_9$

These are easily shown to not be isomorphic to each other by examining their elements. Furthermore, $\mathbb{Z}_{36}$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_9$."

All this I understand. But Hungerford argues that this is a complete characterization of all finite abelian groups of order 36 up to isomorphism. This, I don't understand. How do we guarantee that no other isomorphisms exist? Thank you, and best regards,

kasp9201.

Edit: Here is a clarification of my question. I understand that a finite abelian group of order 36 is indeed isomorphic to the four direct products that I have listed. How do we guarantee that a finite abelian group of order 36 is not isomorphic to more than just these four? A finite abelian group $G$ can be written as the direct product of p-groups $G(p_1) \times G(p_2) \times ... \times G(p_n)$, where if $\vert G \vert = m$, then $p_i \vert m$ for all $i$. Each of these groups $G(p_i)$ can then be written as direct products of cyclic subgroups $(k)$, where $\vert k \vert = p_i^c$, if $k \in G(p_i)$.

It seems to me that Hungerford's argument is that since a finite abelian group $G$ is isomorphic to the direct product of such cyclic subgroups, then it is only isomorphic to such cyclic subgroups. That is, if $G$ was to be isomorphic to any other group, then this group would be isomorphic to one of $G$'s direct products of cyclic subgroups. Is this what Hungerford (and lhf) builds his argument on? If so, why is this true?

Thank you again, and I apologize for any inconvenience

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The key fact is "The number 36 can be written as a product of prime powers in just four ways". $\endgroup$ – lhf Apr 9 '18 at 13:36
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is a classification of abelian groups of order $36$, not of all groups of order $36$. There are of course several isomorphism classes of nonabelian groups of order $36$. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Apr 9 '18 at 13:37
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What you call the Fund. Theo. of Finite Abelian Groups is not even a theorem, as it is false. For example, the finite abelian group $\;\Bbb Z_4=\Bbb Z/4\Bbb Z\;$ is not a direct sum of cyclic group of order a prime . Very important: to read, understand an quote correctly theorems in mathematics. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Apr 9 '18 at 13:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are still talking about all groups of order $36$ when you mean all abelian groups. It is difficult to tell exactly what it is that you do not understand. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Apr 9 '18 at 13:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So you appear to have written down a correct proof that there are exactly four isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order $36$ and then written "all this I understand", but then you wrote: "This I don't understand"! Could you explain more clearly exactly what it is that you do not understand? $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Apr 9 '18 at 14:05
1
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a finite abelian group of order $36$. The fundamental theorem tells us that there exist cyclic subgroups $H_1, ... , H_t$ of prime power order such that $G$ is equal to the (internal) direct sum of $H_1, ... , H_t$. Thus $G = H_1 + \cdots + H_t$ and $H_i \cap (\sum\limits_{j \neq i} H_j) = 0$. The internal and external direct sums are isomorphic. To be more specific, the map sending $(h_1, ... , h_t)$ to $h_1 + \cdots + h_t$ defines a group isomorphism

$$H_1 \times \cdots \times H_t \rightarrow G$$

Each $H_i$ is cyclic of prime power order, say $H_i$ has $p_i^{e_i}$ elements for some prime number $p_i$ and positive integer $e_i$. Then

$$36 = |G| = |H_1| \cdots |H_t| = p_1^{e_1} \cdots p_t^{e_t}$$

By the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, there are only finitely many possibilities of prime numbers $p_i$ and exponents $e_i$ such that the $p_i^{e_i}$ multiply to $36$. Without loss of generality, let us assume that $p_1 \leq \cdots \leq p_t$. Then you can check yourself that the only possibilities for the number $t$, the prime numbers $p_i$, and the exponents $e_i$ are:

$$t= 4, p_1 = p_2 = 2, p_3 = p_4 = 3, e_1 = e_2 = e_3 = e_4 = 1$$

$$t = 3, p_1 = p_2 = 2, p_3 = 3, e_1 = e_2 = 1, e_3 = 2$$

$$t = 3, p_1 = 2, p_2 = p_3 = 3, e_1 = 2, e_2 = e_3 = 1$$

$$t = 2, p_1 = 2, p_2 = 3, e_1 = 2, e_2 = 2$$

Let us suppose we have the third possibility. Then $H_1 \times H_2 \times H_3 \rightarrow G, (h_1, h_2,h_3) \mapsto h_1 + h_2 + h_3$ is a group isomorphism, where $H_1$ is cyclic of order $4$, and $H_2$ and $H_3$ are cyclic of order $3$. All cyclic groups of a given order are isomorphic, so there exist group isomorphisms $\mathbb{Z}_4 \rightarrow H_1, \mathbb{Z}_3 \rightarrow H_2, \mathbb{Z}_3 \rightarrow H_3$. Combining these isomorphisms gives you an isomorphism

$$\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_3 \rightarrow H_1 \times H_2 \times H_3 \rightarrow G$$

so $G$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_4 \times \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_3$. The other possibilities for $t, p_i,e_i$ would show that there exists an isomorphism of $G$ with the other groups.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @D_S. As you can see, I have chosen your answer as an answer to my question. It gave me the intuition I was looking for, so thank you very much! have a nice day $\endgroup$ – kasp9201 Apr 9 '18 at 16:49
2
$\begingroup$

There are two characterization of finite abelian groups by invariants.

The simplest to manage is that a finite abelian group $G$ of order $n$ can be uniquely written (up to isomorphism) as a direct product of cyclic groups $G=G_1\times G_2\times\dots\times G_k$, with $|G_i|=n_i>1$ and $$ n_1\mid n_2\mid \dots \mid n_k $$ (of course $n_1n_2\dots n_k=n$). This is called the invariant factor decomposition.

For $n=36$ we can have \begin{align} &2,18\\ &3,12\\ &6,6\\ &36 \end{align} that is, just four choices. If $C_m$ denotes the cyclic group of order $m$, we can also get the other decomposition (primary decomposition): \begin{align} &C_2\times C_{18}\cong C_2\times C_2\times C_9\\ &C_3\times C_{12}\cong C_3\times C_3\times C_4\\ &C_6\times C_6\cong C_2\times C_2\times C_3\times C_3\\ &C_{36}\cong C_4\times C_9 \end{align}

The fact that these two classifications are complete is a quite deep theorem proved by Kronecker (1870).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi egreg, thank you very much for having taken your time. I've thought about both answers given for a couple of hours now, and they both add nice perspectives on what I wanted. Unfortunately I have to choose an answer, so I picked the one given by D_S by the fact that I figured out my question when reading his answer. But again, thank you very much and have a nice day $\endgroup$ – kasp9201 Apr 9 '18 at 16:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.