6
$\begingroup$

Consider an immigration-death model $X = (X_t)_{t\geq0}$, i.e. a model where immigrants arrive according to a Poisson process with rate $\lambda$ and individuals have independent $Exp(\mu)$ lifetimes.

Suppose $\lambda > 0$. Suppose $X_0 = 0$.

(i) Perform a one-step analysis to justify carefully that $\Phi(t) = \mathbb{E}[z^{X_t} ]$ satisfies $$\Phi(t)=e^{-\lambda t}+\int_0^t\lambda e^{-\lambda s}\Phi(t-s)(1-(1-z)e^{-\mu(t-s)})ds$$

(ii) Solve the integral equation to determine the distribution of $X_t$.

This is an exam question but I can't seem to wrap my head around it:

My attempt: $\mathbb{E}[z^{X_t}]=\int_0^{\infty}\mathbb{E}[z^{X_t}|T_1=s]\lambda e^{-\lambda s}ds=\int_0^t\mathbb{E}[z^{X_t}|T_1=s]\lambda e^{-\lambda s}ds+\int_t^{\infty}\mathbb{E}[z^{X_t}|T_1=s]\lambda e^{-\lambda s}ds=\int_0^t\mathbb{E}[z^{X_t}|T_1=s]\lambda e^{-\lambda s}ds+e^{-\lambda t}$

Now my idea is to apply the Markov property at the time $T_1=s$ which is a stopping time. However, I can't finish the proof since I don't get the extra multiplier $(1-(1-z)e^{-\mu(t-s)})ds$

For (ii) I did a standard multiplication and differentiation to get that the following holds:

$$\Phi'(t)=-\lambda(1-z)e^{-\mu t}\Phi(t)$$

which after integrating gives

$$\Phi(t)=Ce^{\frac{\lambda(1-z)}{\mu}e^{-\mu t}} \text{ for } \mu\neq 0$$

and

$$\Phi(t)=Ce^{-\lambda(1-z)t} \text{ for } \mu=0$$

I can't associate this with any distribution and furthermore, I have a feeling I've messed up the calculations since $\Phi(0)$ should equal $0$. Any help is appreciated!

$\endgroup$
5
+100
$\begingroup$

This looks like an analysis of the transient behavior of an $M/M/\infty$ queue.

1) The formula for $\phi(t)$ you are working towards looks correct. Your work also looks correct (here I assume $T_1$ is the time of the first arrival, and the system is initially empty). The extra step is to compute $$ E[z^{X_t}|T_1=s] = E[z^Az^{X_{t-s}}|T_1=s] $$ where $A$ is a Bernoulli random variable that is 1 if the arrival at time $s$ has not yet left by time $t$, and $0$ else.

2) Note that $\phi(0) = E[z^0]=1$. Let's see, I find the change of variables $x=t-s$ to be useful: \begin{align} x &= t-s\\ dx &= -ds \end{align} $$ \phi(t) = e^{-\lambda t} + \int_0^t \lambda e^{-\lambda (t-x)} \phi(x)[1-(1-z)e^{-\mu x}]dx $$ and multiplying by $e^{\lambda t}$ gives $$ \phi(t) e^{\lambda t} = 1 + \int_0^t \lambda e^{\lambda x} \phi(x) [1-(1-z)e^{-\mu x}]dx $$ which is a nice form for differentiation. Okay this gives the same solution that you get: $$ \phi'(t) = -\lambda (1-z)e^{-\mu t} \phi(t) $$ Assuming $\mu>0$ and using separation of variables, I get the same solution as you $$ \phi(t) = C e^{(\lambda/\mu)(1-z)e^{-\mu t}} $$ So it remains only to solve for $C$ (which can depend on $\lambda, \mu, z$) by using $\phi(0)=1$ (not $\phi(0)=0$). You can test your final answer by letting $t\rightarrow\infty$, so $\phi(t)$ should converge to the z-transform of the Poisson distribution.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you elaborate more on the first step, please? $\endgroup$ – asdf Apr 29 '18 at 15:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.