3
$\begingroup$

I've been reading Milne's notes on absolute values and local fields (Chapter 7 of the book on algebraic number theory), and a possibly minor point is confusing me.

On page 126, Milne writes, "$K$ is a field complete with respect to a discrete absolute value $|\cdot|$..." and then he talks about things that only make sense for non-archimedean absolute values, like the ring of integers and its maximal ideal.

Is every discrete absolute value on a field $K$ also non-archimedean? This would explain a lot, but I also suspect that it is not true, because I can't find any statement of this fact anywhere.

EDIT: An absolute value is discrete if the value group $|K^\times|$ is a discrete subgroup of the multiplicative group $\mathbb{R}_{>0}$. An absolute value is non-archimedean if it satisfies the stronger triangle inequality $$ |x+y| \le \max (|x|,|y|) $$ or equivalently if the set $\{|1|,|1+1|,|1+1+1|,\ldots\}$ is a bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My questions are much like those of @mathmo, now deleted. I suppose that “discrete valuation” means that the value group is cyclic. My specific question is just what makes a valuation archimedean. I would suppose that in such a valuation, $\Bbb Z$ is unbounded, that is, that $\vert\Bbb Z\vert$ is an unbounded set of reals. But I’m not sure that this is your definition. $\endgroup$ – Lubin Apr 9 '18 at 1:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Lubin I deleted my comment after checking out Milne's notes. By discrete, Milne literally means that the image of the absolute value is discrete. By non-archimedean, he means that the absolute value is ultrametric. $\endgroup$ – Mathmo123 Apr 9 '18 at 2:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Mathmo123, thanks for the clarification. Pleading age, I’m much too lazy to go to Milne’s work. I await OP’s illumination. $\endgroup$ – Lubin Apr 9 '18 at 2:04
  • $\begingroup$ If the image of $|\cdot|$ is discrete, then the set $|K^\times|\cap(0,1)\subset \mathbb R_{>0}$ has a maximal element, $\lambda$. Then $v(x) = \log_\lambda(x)$ is a valuation which corresponds to $|\cdot|$. $\endgroup$ – Mathmo123 Apr 9 '18 at 2:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Mathmo123 I agree, how does this resolve the question? $\endgroup$ – Joshua Ruiter Apr 9 '18 at 2:24
3
$\begingroup$

You’re asking for a proposition that if $K$ has an absolute value $\vert\!\star\!\vert$ that’s archimedean, then the value group $\vert K^\times\vert\subset\Bbb R^{>0}$ is not cyclic.

In other words, you want a sequence of elements $z_n\in K$ with all $\vert z_n\vert<1$, but $\lim_n\vert z_n\vert=1$.

My proof below seems sloppy, and I welcome improvements. When I say “numbers” here, I mean non-negative integers, the set of all these being denoted $\Bbb N$, and the fact that $K$ is of characteristic zero implies that there is a unique map $\Bbb Z\to K$, so I’ll treat $\Bbb N$ as a subset of $K$.

Our hypothesis is that $\vert\Bbb N\vert$ is an unbounded set of reals. Among the numbers, I will call $m\in\Bbb N$ a “jump number” if $\vert m-1\vert<\vert m\vert$. Standardly, of course, every positive number is a jump number, but I don’t see an immediate reason to see that under our hypotheses. Clearly, though, there are infinitely many jump numbers, and their absolute values form an unbounded subset of $\Bbb R$. This is how we use the archimedean hypothesis.

For any jump number $m$, we get $\vert1-\frac1m\vert<1$. That’s the easy inequality. But there is a jump number $a_1$ with $1\le\vert a_1\vert$, and similarly there is for each $n\in\Bbb N$, there is a jump number $a_n$ with $n\le\vert a_n\vert$. Now, using the form of the triangle inequality that says $\vert x-y\vert\ge\vert x\vert-\vert y\vert$, we have \begin{align} n&\le\vert a_n\vert\\ \frac1n&\ge\frac1{\vert a_n\vert}\\ 1-\frac1n&\le1-\left\vert\frac1{a_n}\right\vert\le\left\vert1-\frac1{a_n}\right\vert<1\,, \end{align} so that we take $z_n=1-\frac1{a_n}$ to complete the proof.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see any improvement to the proof. One thing to note is that we can assume the characteristic is zero since all absolute values on positive characteristic fields are nonarchimedean. $\endgroup$ – Joshua Ruiter Apr 9 '18 at 22:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.