0
$\begingroup$

Let $E$ be complex vector bundle of rank $r$ over a top. space $X$ and $p:\mathbb{P}(E) \to X$ the associated projective bundle of lines in $E$.

Why $p^*E$ containes the linebundle $L = \{(l,u)\in \mathbb{P}(E) \times E \vert v \in l\}$?

Ideas: because of similarities to $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_n}(-1) = \{(l,u)\in \mathbb{P}_n \times E \vert v \in l\}$ (by the way: how to see that this equation holds?), I suppose that $L = p^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_n}(-1)$.

But here there occure four problems to me:

  1. If we have a morphism between schemes $f:X \to Y$ I know how the induced functor $f^*$ maps a sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $Y$ to a sheaf on $X$ via $\mathcal{G} \mapsto f^{-1}\mathcal{G} \otimes{f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_Y} \mathcal{O}_X$.

But how to interpret $f^*$ if $f$ is just a morphism between vector bundle and a topological space?

  1. Does $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_n}(-1) \subset E$ hold & why?

  2. And if 2. holds why does it imply $p^* \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_n}(-1) \subset p^*E$. The functor $p^*$ is just right exact, so why does it preserve injectivity?

Background of my question: "Vector Bundles on Complex Projective Spaces" von Okonek, Schneider and Spindler, page 7: enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

In general you can define the pullback $f^*E$ of a vector bundle $\pi:E\to B$ along a map $f:C\to B$ in the following way: $$ f^*E=\{(c,e)\in C\times E| f(c)=\pi(E)\}\subset C\times E$$ (See also here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pullback_bundle)

Now consider $p:\mathbb{P}(E)\to X$ , then we get: $$ p^*E=\{(l,v)\in \mathbb{P}(E)\times E| p(l)=\pi(v)\}\subset \mathbb{P}(E)\times E$$ Now check that $v\in l$ will imply $p(l)=\pi(v)$, which is a simple consequence of the construction of the projective bundle (and the map $p$)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi. Thank you for the enlightening answer. One question: Do you have a nice reference for the construction of the projective bundle of $E$? The wiki explanation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_bundle using universal property don't helps to understand the local behavior of $\mathbb{P}(E)$ $\endgroup$ – KarlPeter Apr 7 '18 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ well in general I think Huybrechts' "Complex Geometry" and Voision's "Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry" provide good references in general. For your question: I found on p.77/78 in the latter reference some lines about projective bundles, that's the best that I can think of right now $\endgroup$ – Notone Apr 7 '18 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ If $(l,v)\in \mathbb{P}(E)\times E$ with $p(l)=\pi(v)$, how do you mean $v \in l$? Do you mean with $v \in l$ more precisely $[v] = l$ as equivalence class since $\mathbb{P}(E) = E \backslash s(X) / \sim$ where the equilvalence relation is defined via $ v_1 \sim v_2 \Leftrightarrow \pi(v_1) = \pi(v_2) \text{ and there exist } c \in k \setminus \{0\} \text{ with } v_2 = c v_1 $? $\endgroup$ – KarlPeter Apr 7 '18 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ Here my reference: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/projective+bundle $\endgroup$ – KarlPeter Apr 7 '18 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the equivalence class brackets are sometimes omitted, i.e. $v\in l$ means that the $v$ lies in the line that is "spanned" by $l$ (since each $l$ represents a one dimensional subspace) $\endgroup$ – Notone Apr 7 '18 at 17:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.