1
$\begingroup$

Consider the map $\phi : O \rightarrow S $ s.t $a+bw \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ \dfrac{D-1}{4}b & a+b\end{bmatrix}$

Where $O$ is the quadratic integer ring and $S$ the set $\{\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ \dfrac{D-1}{4}b & a+b\end{bmatrix}, a,b \in \mathbb{Z} \}$.

Now I showed that $\phi$ is homomorphic.

I want to show that $S$ is a subring of $M_2(\mathbb{Z})$

Since $\phi$ is homomorphic, I know that $Im(\phi)$ (which is equal to $S$) is isomorphic to $S$.

I guess I could simply create the homomorphism $\delta : O \rightarrow M_2(\mathbb{Z}) $ which maps $a+bw$ onto $\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ \dfrac{D-1}{4}b & a+b\end{bmatrix}$

and similarly, show that $\delta$ is homomorphic and that it's image is S and therefore, by the first isomorphism theorem that $S$ is a subring of $M_2(\mathbb{Z})$.

Is that the right way to go about?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is $w$ ?... $\endgroup$ – lhf Apr 3 '18 at 23:54
  • $\begingroup$ What quadratic integer ring? There are many of them. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Apr 4 '18 at 0:41
0
$\begingroup$

Well, you already know hat $S$ is a subset of $M_2(\mathbb{Z})$, because the matrix has entries in the integers, now we need to show that $S$ is closed under multiplication and addition. Addition is easy as: $$\begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ \frac{D-1}{4} b_1 & a_1+b_1 \end{pmatrix} +\begin{pmatrix} a_2 & b_2 \\ \frac{D-1}{4} b_2 & a_2+b_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a_3 & b_3 \\ \frac{D-1}{4}b_4 & a_3+b_3 \end{pmatrix} \in S $$ Where $a_3 =a_1 + a_2$, $b_3 = b_1 + b_2$. Multiplication is the same procedure (multiply two matrices and check that the entries satisfy the conditions for $S$), and the identity and 0 matrices are both in $S$, so it is a subring of $M_2(\mathbb{Z})$. No need for any fancy isomorphism theorems or anything, just simply bookkeeping of definitions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I know! My question is on the isomorphism theorem though. I know the regular way of showing that it's a subring $\endgroup$ – Sylvester Stallone Apr 3 '18 at 21:14
  • $\begingroup$ What are you asking then, you definition of $\phi$ and $\delta$ are the same and the first iso thm won't really help you get subrings in this case, only quotient rings, but you haven't mentioned anything about ideals. $\endgroup$ – PTIYL Apr 3 '18 at 21:17
0
$\begingroup$

I assume that $\mathcal{O}$ is the ring of integers in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt D)$ with $D\equiv 1 \bmod 4$, and so $\mathcal{O} = \mathbb Z \, 1 + \mathbb Zw$ with $w=\dfrac{1+\sqrt D}{2}$.

Here is how this isomorphism comes up.

Let $\alpha = a + bw \in \mathcal{O}$ and consider the map $\mu: x \mapsto x\alpha$.

With respect to the $\mathbb Z$-basis of $\mathcal{O}$ given by $(1,w)$, the map $\mu$ is represented by the matrix $$ A=\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ \dfrac{D-1}{4}b & a+b\end{bmatrix} $$ in the sense that $$ \mu(1) = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\end{bmatrix} A \\ \mu(w) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} A $$ In other words, if $x = u + v w \in \mathcal{O}$, then $$ \mu(x) = \begin{bmatrix} u & v\end{bmatrix} A $$ These maps $\mu$ induce a homomorphism $\phi:\mathcal{O} \to M_2(\mathbb{Z})$ given by $\alpha \mapsto A$.

Since $x(\alpha\beta)=(x\alpha)\beta$, we have the matrix identity $[x](AB)=([x]A)B$ and so $\phi(\alpha\beta)=\phi(\alpha)\phi(\beta)$.

It is easy to prove that $\phi$ is injective and that its image is $S$. This implies that $\mathcal{O} \cong \operatorname{im}(\phi) = S$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.