5
$\begingroup$

Can a plane be written as union $\bigcup_{n=1}^{+ \infty}I_n$ of sets $I_n$ such that every $I_n$ is convex and an area of $I_n$ is $\frac{1}{n}$ and $I_n \bigcap I_m$ is a curve or an empty set if $m \neq n$?

Few minutes ago I remebered of harmonic series and started to think, because sum of it is $+ \infty$ can we in some way write a plane as union of infinite number of sets $I_n$, such that area of $I_n$ is $\frac {1}{n}$. There are such partitions of the plane when sets need not be convex, but what if we require that all are convex, like a question is, can we then do that?

Edit(bonus question):

What if we require that all convex sets have differentiable curves as boundaries?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You can make each one a 1 by 1/n rectangle. For disjointness, make them all open to the right and above. Gerhard "It Will Take A While" Paseman, 2018.03.27. $\endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    Mar 27, 2018 at 20:56
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Show me a compact, simply connected region of the plane divided into two convex regions by a differentiable curve that is not a line. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2018 at 3:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This seems to be more suited on Math SE, by the way. $\endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 28, 2018 at 3:56

6 Answers 6

11
$\begingroup$

Yes it can, even for the rectangles with vertical and horizontal sides. On $k$-th step the union of $I_1,\dots,I_{n_k}$ is a rectangle $[a_k,b_k]\times [c_k,d_k]$ where $a_k<-k<k<b_k,c_k<-k<k<d_k$. For doing next step, we add several rectangles to the top, then to the left, then to the bottom, then to the right so that new bounds exceed $k+1$ in absolute value. This is possible since the harmonic series diverges.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ What if we require that boundaries of convex sets are differentiable curves? $\endgroup$
    – Shalom
    Mar 27, 2018 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ So at each step you add a large number of rectangles with the number growing rapidly. $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2018 at 21:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AaronMeyerowitz well, yes, but is it forbidden? $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2018 at 21:01
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @Shalom I am afraid that the plane can not be partitioned onto smooth convex bodies (of any areas). $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2018 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ No, I was just confused at first how at step $1$ an area bigger than one was already covered. $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2018 at 22:43
9
$\begingroup$

A sequence of rectangles $R_i$ of size $1\times a_i$ for $i=1,2,3\ldots$ with $a_i\ge 1$ can be filled with rectangles $1\times \frac{1}{n}$ generated by the harmonic series. Then the rectangles $R_i$ can be used to tile the plane by stacking them to form a sequence of parallel strips, each of width $1$. To avoid two tiles intersecting in a single point, shift every other strip by $\sqrt2$ in the direction of the strips.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

It is hard to smoothly fit together closed convex sets with differentiable boundaries. It seems it might be possible to use only disks which sometimes intersect in a point (if that is allowed) or even are all disjoint. For the easier version let the $n$th disk have center as close to the origin as possible breaking ties by going counterclockwise.

On second thought, this might be similar to an Apollonian Gasket and have (or be contained in a set of) fractal dimension.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Divide the plane into strips of width $1$. Partition each strip into rectangles with width $1$ and lengths (not in order) as follows:

Strip 1: $\frac11,\frac13,\frac15,\frac17,\cdots$

Strip 2: $\frac12,\frac16,\frac1{10},\frac1{14},\cdots$

Strip 3: $\frac14,\frac1{12},\frac1{20},\frac1{28},\cdots$

$\vdots$

Do you see the pattern? It is easy to prove that each strip can be covered by the specified rectangles, since $\frac1{2^{-k}}(\frac11+\frac13+\frac15+\cdots) = \infty$ and you can place the rectangles alternatingly on the left and right. It is also very basic number theory to prove that each reciprocal of a natural number occurs exactly once.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice idea! Looks familiar... $\endgroup$
    – LeoTheKub
    Mar 28, 2018 at 21:11
  • $\begingroup$ @WlodekKuperberg: Well it's 100% constructive. =) $\endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 29, 2018 at 7:44
3
$\begingroup$

Here is a tiling using the rectangles $R_n$ of height $1$ and width $\frac1n$ with the feature that the location of any particular one is fairly explicit:

The rectangles will form rows divided by the lines $y=k.$

Let $n=2^im$ with $m$ odd. Then the lower left corner of $R_n$ will be at $$(\frac{x_m}{2^i},k)$$ where $k=\frac{i}2$ or $k=-\frac{i+1}2$ according as $i$ is even or odd.

Above $y=0$ are the $R_m$ with odd $m$ in the order $$\cdots R_{11}R_7R_3R_1R_5R_9\cdots$$ with $R_1$ having lower left corner at $(0,0).$ This main row now determines the $x_m$ and the tiling. Specifically $x_m$ is either $1+1/5+1/9+\cdots+1/(m-4)$ or $-(1/3+1/7+1/11+\cdots+1/m).$

So to the right of the $y$-axis going up are $$\cdots R_{32}R_8R_2R_1R_4R_{16}\cdots$$ with each row the same as the main row except compressed horizontally by the appropriate power of $2.$

If desired, every other row can be shifted horizontally by $\sqrt{2}$ to avoid the points $(0,k)$ from being the intersections of two rectangles.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice idea! Looks familiar... $\endgroup$
    – LeoTheKub
    Mar 28, 2018 at 21:12
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is not that different than your construction (which I upvoted!). It just more explicit in what the neighbors of a specific small rectangle are (at least in one direction.) Indeed I used your choice of $\sqrt{2}$ as the irrational shift. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2018 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ Looks different to me. Gerhard "It Has Some Overlapping Pieces" Paseman, 2018.03.28. $\endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    Mar 28, 2018 at 22:58
  • $\begingroup$ Who has overlaps? My construction is very much like that of user21820. Wlodek makes compound rectangles that are 1 in one dimension and slightly over 1 in the other (choices left to the constructor) then gathers those into rows. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2018 at 23:27
2
$\begingroup$

Concerning your "bonus question" about convex sets with differentiable boundaries, you may be interested in the old result by Helmut Groemer, On packings and coverings of unit density, Mathematika, 35 (1988), 172-179:

Let $C_i$ be a sequence of convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^n$ of infinite total volume and whose diameters converge to 0. Then there exists a subsequence of $C_i$ that permits a packing of the unit cube $Q$ such that the set of points in $Q$ not covered by the packing is of measure zero.

It follows immediately that ${\mathbb R}^n$ can be almost partitioned into a sequence of smooth-boundary convex bodies whose total volume is infinite and whose diameters converge to zero. It seems that a perfect partition is impossible, so this may be the best we can expect.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .