0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove that if $B$ is a finitely generated $A$-module and $A$ is an integral domain, then $B$ is a free module. I don't know if there exists some result about this problem or is just straigthforward.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's not true . $\endgroup$ – Angina Seng Apr 1 '18 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Every projective module over a PID is free, see here. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Apr 1 '18 at 11:50
  • $\begingroup$ $\;\Bbb Z/2\Bbb Z\;$ is a finitely generated $\;\Bbb Z\,-$ module, yet it is not a free $\;\Bbb Z\,-$ module... $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Apr 1 '18 at 11:51
2
$\begingroup$

It is simply false: $\mathbf Z/n\mathbf Z$ is finitely generated (cyclic, generated by $1+n\mathbf Z$) but certainly not free, since $\;n\cdot(1+n\mathbf Z)=0+n\mathbf Z$.

However the assertion is true for finitely generated torsion-free modules over P.I.D.s.

For other integral domains, a counter-example is the ring $A=K[X,Y]$, where $K$ is a field: the ideal $(X,Y)$ is minimally generated by $X$ and $Y$, it is torsion-free, but there's a linear relation between its generators: $$Y\cdot X-X\cdot Y=0.$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If we add some hypothesis, for example, $B$ is also an integral domain, $A$ and $B$ are both local rings, the result is still false or ir turns true? $\endgroup$ – Edude Apr 1 '18 at 12:13
  • $\begingroup$ The only results I know is about integral closure of an integral domain i a finite separable extension of its field of fraction. It supposes the discriminant is a unit in $A$. In particular, $B$ is free over $A$ if $A$ is a P.I.D. $\endgroup$ – Bernard Apr 1 '18 at 12:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.