5
$\begingroup$

I need some help translating the following sentence to English. It is from (3.6.2) in EGA I.

Si $U,V$ sont deux ouverts non vides dans $X$, $U \cap V$ est non vide, donc $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ et $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U)$ étant des isomorphismes, il en est de même de $\mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ et de même $\mathcal{F}(V) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ est un isomorphisme.

My attempt:

If $U,V$ are two non-empty open subsets of $X$, $U \cap V$ is non-empty, so $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ and $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U)$ being isomorphisms, it is the same with $\mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ and similarly $\mathcal{F}(V) \to \mathcal{F}(U \cap V)$ is an isomorphism.

In particular, I'm not sure if the part about $U \cap V$ should be "and if $U \cap V$ is non-empty" or whether I've mistranslated the repeated "de même" construction.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Your translation is good. $U\cap V$ is not empty here because $X$ is irreducible. This proposition starts with suppose that $X$ is irreducible...

https://topospaces.subwiki.org/wiki/Irreducible_space

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.