# Series converges if partial sums are bounded? [closed]

Suppose $a_n$ is a sequence in $\mathbb R$ and $S_n=\sum_{k=1}^na_k$ when $S_n$ has bound.

Then does $\sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k$ converge?

## closed as off-topic by Daniel FischerMar 30 '18 at 13:42

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Daniel Fischer
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

No: the series $\sum_n(-1)^n$ is a counter-example.

However, if the series has non-negative terms, and if the partial sums are bounded, the series converge by the monotone convergence theorem.

• Because the partial sums will form an increasing sequence and hence, if bounded, will converge to the supremum? – A.Asad Mar 30 '18 at 12:05
• @A.Asad: Yes, exactly. – Bernard Mar 30 '18 at 12:09

Take $a_n=(-1)^n$. As you can see, $S_n$ is not convergent.

No.

The series converges if and only if $S_n$ has a limit as $n\to\infty$. Having a limit does not follow from being bounded. For any sequence $(S_n)$ you can find the corresponding sequence $(a_n)$ by letting $a_n=S_n-S_{n-1}$.

Now you can take your favorite bounded sequence $(S_n)$ with no limit and define $a_n$ like above. Then your conditions are satisfied but the series won't converge.

Well, the series is not convergent necessarily but since $S_n$ is bounded, there is a convergent subsequence $S_{n_k}$ of $S_n$. In other words, a "sub-series" of $\sum_{n}a_n$ converges.