If $K$ is a field extension of $F$, then $\alpha \in K$ is algebraic over $F$ if and only if $[F(\alpha):F] < \infty$. Moreover, $K$ is algebraic over $F$ if $[K:F] < \infty$


$(\Longrightarrow)$ Suppose that $\alpha \in K$ is algebraic over $F$. Thus, theres exists $\min(F,\alpha)$ and $\deg(\min(F, \alpha)) < \infty$. By the Result 1, $[F(\alpha):F] = \deg(\min(F, \alpha)) < \infty$.

$(\Longleftarrow)$ I couldn't do it. $\square$

Some of the results that I proved:

  • $\bf{Result\; 1:}$ Let $K$ is a fiel extension of $F$ and let $\alpha \in K$ be algebraic over $F$. Then

If $n=\deg(\min(F,\alpha))$, then the elements $1, \alpha, ..., \alpha^{n-1}$ form a basis for $F(\alpha)$ over $F$, so $[F(\alpha):F] = \deg(\min(F, \alpha)) < \infty$. Moreover, $F(\alpha) = F[\alpha]$.

  • $\bf{Result\; 2:}$ If $K$ is a finite extension of $F$, then $K$ is algebraic and finitely generated over $F$.

  • $\bf{Result\; 3:}$ Let $F \subseteq L \subseteq K$ be fields. Then $$[K:F] = [K:L].[L:F].$$

  • $\bf{Result\; 4:}$ Let $K$ be a field extension of $F$. If each $\alpha_{i} \in K$ is algebraic over $F$, then $F[\alpha_{1}, ..., \alpha_{n}]$ is a finite dimensional field extension of $F$ with $$[F[\alpha_{1}, ..., \alpha_{n}]:F]\leq \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}[F(\alpha_{i}):F].$$

I know it's something small I can't see. I liked any hint, no complete solutions. I think it's enough to use Results 2 and 4. But I don't know how.

  • $\begingroup$ If you've proved result 1, then you've proved one direction. The other direction uses more linear algebra than field theory. $\endgroup$ – user123641 Mar 29 '18 at 22:16

Hint: if $[F(\alpha) : F] < \infty$, the elements $1, \alpha, \alpha^2, \ldots$ cannot be linearly independent in $F(\alpha)$ viewed as a vector space over $F$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ $[F(\alpha):F] = n$ implies $a_{0} + a_{1}\alpha + ... + a_{n}\alpha^{n} = 0$ with $a_{i} \neq 0$ and $a_{i} \in F$? $\endgroup$ – Corrêa Mar 29 '18 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ That sounds good to me. $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Mar 29 '18 at 22:36
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the help! $\endgroup$ – Corrêa Mar 29 '18 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ @LucasCorrêa: well, that's mostly correct. You can't assert that $a_{i} \neq 0$ for all $i$, only that not all $a_{i}$ are $0$. (But your main idea is correct.) $\endgroup$ – Alex Wertheim Mar 29 '18 at 22:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.