2
$\begingroup$

A contravariant functor $\mathcal{F}:C\rightarrow Set$ is representable iff it has an universal object.

Prove:

[$\Rightarrow$] As $\mathcal{F}$ is representable, then $\tau:h_X\rightarrow \mathcal{F}$ is an isomorphism for some $X\in C$.

Claim:$(X,\tau_X(1_X))$ is an universal object of $\mathcal{F}$ where $1_X\in h_XX$.

I was able to prove that claim and with that I prove the $[\Rightarrow]$ part, I am having problems with the reverse $[\Leftarrow]$. Can anybody give me some suggestion? I have done this:

$[\Leftarrow]$ Suppose $(X,a)$ with $X\in C$ and $a\in X$ is an universal object of $\mathcal{F}$, I need to show that it is representable. Lets consider the natural transformation $\tau:h_X\rightarrow \mathcal{F}$ for some $X\in C$, I have to show now that $\forall U\in C$ we have that $\tau_U:h_XU\rightarrow \mathcal{F}(U)$ is an isomorphism (or a bijection because I am on the set category), for this final statement can anybody give me any suggestion?

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $(X, a) $ is a universal object for $\def\m{\mathcal} \m F:\m C\to\m Set$.
Then for every $(C, c) $ with $c\in\m FC$, there is a unique $f:X\to C$ with $\m Ff(a) =c$.

The representative object in this case will be $X$, and we can define $\tau:h_X\to \m F$ by $h_XC\ni f\mapsto \m Ff(a) \in\m FC$.
The uniqueness criterium of the universal property can either provide an inverse, or prove that it's a bijection componentwise, i.e. a natural isomorphism.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.