3
$\begingroup$

working myself through a proof of the fact, that every closed Ideal in $C_0(X)$ for a locally compact Hausdorff space X is of the form $I_F=\{f\in C_0(X)\colon f\lvert_F \equiv 0\}$ for one and only one closed subspace $F\subseteq X$, I came to the point where I want to show that for every $F$ as above the following holds $$I_F\cong C_0(X\setminus F).$$

Since the canonical inclusion $I\colon F \to X$ is proper, $i_F^\ast\colon C_0(X) \to C_0(F)$ is a *-homomorphism.

Then I want to use some kind of argument involving Tietze's theorem to show that this map is surjective I guess. But since Tietze's extension theorem applies only to normal spaces and to my knowledge locally compact spaces needn't be normal I'm a bit confused here. Can someone point me to a corollary that does the trick?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I don't think you need any theorem. If $f\in I_F$, then you can see $f\in C_0(X\setminus F)$ by restriction. And if $g\in C_0(X\setminus F)$, extend to $C_0(X)$ by $g|_F=0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.