2
$\begingroup$

I'm following a few papers describing the Galerkin finite element method for a particular physical process. They all start with the same initial definition:

$$ h \approx \hat h(x,y,z,t) = \sum_{n=1}^N \phi_n(x,y,z) h_n(t) $$

where $h_n$ is the amplitude of $h$ at nodal point $n$ and $\phi_n$ is the base function at nodal point $n$. I think I follow this... it seems pretty straightforward. However, when they state the variational form and numerical form, new subscripts get added and I have no idea what they are referring to. This seems to be common enough that I believe it must be a standard notation in this field I'm not familiar with.

For example, here's a snippet of the variational form:

$$ \sum_e \int_\Omega \frac{\partial \hat h}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial \phi_n}{\partial x_i}\ \mathrm{d}\Omega\ \dots $$

What might the subscripts $i$ and $j$ represent?

Then during the explanation of integration over the elements, the numerical form is presented. Here's a snippet of that:

$$ \sum_e \int_\Omega \phi_l \frac{\partial \phi_n}{\partial x_j} \frac{\partial \phi_m}{\partial x_i}\ \mathrm{d}\Omega\ \dots $$

What might the new subscripts $l$ and $m$ represent?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $x_i$ and $x_j$ refers to variables on which the function $h$ depends: $x_1$ $x_2$ when the the function depends on two spatial variables etc $\endgroup$ – AlphaXY Mar 21 '18 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ In order to understand Galerkin method you can take the case of Fourier serie truncation you have the decomposition $u(x,t)= \sum_{k\in \mathbb{Z}}c_ke^{ikx}$ in that case the Galerkin projector applied on $u$ truncate up to $n$, namely $$P_nu= \sum_{|k|\leq n}c_ke^{ikx}$$ $\endgroup$ – AlphaXY Mar 21 '18 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so for 3D $u(x_i) = u(x_1, x_2, x_3)$. Right? But why the additional subscript $j$ if $i$ already denotes the three dimension? $\endgroup$ – user276833 Mar 21 '18 at 18:49
1
$\begingroup$

The multiplication of partial derivatives requires two index $i$ and $j$ take for example $$\frac{\partial h}{\partial x_1} \frac{\partial h}{\partial x_2}$$ You need an index $i$ to represent one and a different index to represent two or three

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.