21
$\begingroup$

On page 146, James Munkres' textbook Topology(2ed),

Show that $G$(a topological group) is Hausdorff. In fact, show that if $x \neq y$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $e$ such that $V \cdot x$ and $V \cdot y$ are disjoint.

Noticeably, the definition of topological group in Munkres's textbook differs from that in wikipedia.

A topological group $G$ is a group that is also a topological space satisfying the $T_1$ axiom, such that the map of $G \times G$ into $G$ sending $x \times y$ into $x \cdot y$ and the map of $G$ into $G$ sending $x$ into $x^{-1}$, are continuous maps.

$\endgroup$
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, some people use a definition of a topological group which does not include $T_1$, so those won't be Hausdorff. $\endgroup$ – Keenan Kidwell Jan 3 '13 at 18:44
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Sigur That points are closed. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Jan 3 '13 at 18:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Sigur: All definitions of $T_1$ that I’ve seen are equivalent, so it doesn’t matter. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Jan 3 '13 at 18:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BrianM.Scott, I know that. I've just asked to suggest him to read about $T_1$ spaces. $\endgroup$ – Sigur Jan 3 '13 at 18:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For Further Reading; If $G$ is a topologial group the following conditions are equivalent. i) $G$ is a $T_{0}$ space. ii) $G$ is a $T_{1}$ space. iii) $G$ is a $T_{2}$ space. iv) If $\beta_{e} $ is a fundamental system of neighborhoods of $e$ then $\cap \beta_{e} =\{e\} $. v) \{e\} is a closed subgroup of $G$. vi) For all $f:H\rightarrow G$ in $\tau g$, $Kerf$ is a closed subgroup of $H$. $\endgroup$ – M.Sina Jan 4 '13 at 19:29
22
$\begingroup$

A space $X$ is Hausdorff if and only if the diagonal $\Delta_X\subseteq X\times X$ is closed. Consider the map $G\times G\rightarrow G$ given by $(x,y)\mapsto xy^{-1}$. It is continuous by the axioms for a topological group, and the diagonal is the inverse image of the the identity $\{e\}$, which is closed by assumption. So $G$ is Hausdorff if $\{e\}$ is closed, i.e., if $G$ is $T_1$ (by homogeneity, $T_1$ for $G$ is equivalent to $\{e\}$ being closed).

Given $x\neq y$ in a Hausdorff $G$, let $U_x$ and $U_y$ be disjoint opens around $x$ and $y$, respectively. Both $U_xx^{-1}$ and $U_yy^{-1}$ are opens around $e$, so we can find open $V$ with $e\in V\subseteq U_xx^{-1}\cap U_yy^{-1}$. Then $Vx$ and $Vy$ are disjoint neighborhoods of $x$ and $y$, as desired.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

A topological space $G$ is hausdorff iff the diagonal in $G\times G$ is closed. Can you see how the diagonal is the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

By the above argument, there are two cases:

  1. If {1} is closed then the diagonal is closed (as it is the inverese image of {1} under the continuous map $g_1 \times g_2\rightarrow g_1g_2^{-1}$). So G is Hausdorff.
  2. If {1} is open then G is discrete, so it's Hausdorff.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.