Given a vector space $V = P_1(\mathbb{R})$ and $f_1,f_2 \in V^*$ where $V^*$ is the dual space of $V$ and $$ f_1 = \int_0^1 p(t) \, dt \quad\text{and}\quad f_2 = \int_0^2 p(t) \, dt $$ prove that $\{f_1,f_2\}$ is a basis for $V^*$ and find a basis for $V$ for which it is the dual basis.

I tried using the classical argument for a basis.

Let $p(x) = a + bx$.

By a theorem, we know that $\dim(V) = \dim(V^*)$. Since we have 2 vectors and $\dim(V) = 2$ it remains to show that $\{f_1,f_2\}$ is linearly independent in order for it to be a basis. In order for $\{f_1,f_2\}$ to be linearly independent, it must satisfy that for any $ v = p(x) \in V$, $$ c_1f_1(v) + c_2f_2(v) = 0 \implies c_1 = c_2 = 0 $$

I get as far as: $$ c_1(a+\frac{b}{2}) + c_2(2a + 2b) = 0 $$

However, since $a,b$ are both elements of $\mathbb{R}$, the system is underdetermined and I have an infinite number of solutions. i.e. $$ c_1(a+\frac{b}{2}) = c_2(-2a - 2b) $$

Wouldn't this suggest that $\{f_1,f_2\}$ is not linearly independent?

The solution manual I am looking at only offers the following: We know that $$ \begin{align*} f_1(p(x)) &= f_1(a+bx) = a+\frac{b}{2} \\ f_2(p(x)) &= f_2(a+bx) = 2a+2b \end{align*} $$

Then, it goes on to say that: $$ a+bx = (a+\frac{b}{2})(2-2x) + (2a+2b)(-\frac{1}{2} + x) $$

Firstly, I have no idea how it arrived at this result. Second of all, I do not know how this would help prove linear independence for $\{f_1,f_2\}$. Any help would be appreciated.


Given that $\{f_1, f_2\}$ form the dual basis of a particular basis $\{v_1,v_2\}$ for some $v_1,v_2 \in V$, we know that $f_i(v_j) = \delta_{ij}$ where $\delta_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta function. This implies that, letting $v_1 = p_1(x) = a_1 + b_1x$ and $v_2 = p_2(x) = a_2 + b_2x$ $$ \begin{align*} 1 &= f_1(v_1) = a_1+\frac{b_1}{2} \\ 0 &= f_2(v_1) = 2a_1+2b_1 \end{align*} $$

Solving this system, we get that $v_1 = 2 - 2x$.

Similarly, $$ \begin{align*} 0 &= f_1(v_2) = a_1+\frac{b_1}{2} \\ 1 &= f_2(v_2) = 2a_1+2b_1 \end{align*} $$

Solving gives us that $v_2 = -\frac{1}{2} + x$.

From this we get that the basis of $V$ for which $\{f_1, f_2\}$ is the dual basis is $\{(2 - 2x), (-\frac{1}{2} + x)\}$.

However, I am still struggling to prove linear independence in order to show that $\{f_1, f_2\}$ is a basis in the first place.


For $f_1,f_2$ to be linearly independent, you need to check that

$$ c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2 = 0_{V^{*}} \implies c_1 = c_2 = 0. $$

The element $c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2$ is a linear functional so you need to check that if $c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2$ is the zero functional then $c_1 = c_2 = 0$. This means that if

$$ (c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2)(v) = 0 $$

for all polynomials $v = ax + b$ then you need to show that $c_1 = c_2 = 0$.

Let's write this explicitly. Assume that $c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2 = 0_{V^{*}}$. Then for all $v = ax + b$ we have

$$ c_1f_1(v) + c_2f_2(v) = c_1 \left( a + \frac{b}{2} \right) + c_2 \left( 2a + 2b \right) = 0. $$

Choosing $a = 1, b = -2$ we get

$$ -4c_2 = 0 \implies c_2 = 0. $$

Similarly, choosing $a = 1, b = -1$, we get

$$ \frac{1}{2} c_1 = 0 \implies c_1 = 0 $$

so indeed the linear functionals $f_1,f_2$ are linearly independent.

The solution manual already gives you the dual basis. Recall that if $v_1,\dots,v_n$ is a basis for $V$ and $f^1, \dots, f^n$ is the corresponding dual basis of $V^{*}$, we have for any vector $v$ the identity

$$ v = f^1(v) v_1 + \dots + f^n(v) v_n. $$

In your case, $v_1 = 2 - 2x$ and $v_2 = -\frac{1}{2} + x$.

  • $\begingroup$ Isn't choosing a particular value for a and b getting rid of the generality of the equation. i.e. shouldn't linear independence hold for any values of a and b rather than some particular values of a and b. Also, did the solution manual arrive at these values for v1 and v2 through some particular method or were they only chosen due to their ability to form a vector v in V of the form a + bx when multiplied by the corresponding functional applied to v and put in linear combination? $\endgroup$ Mar 17 '18 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I think I may have answered my own comment here. You can plug in any values you want for a and b since the linear independence of functionals should hold for all v = a + bx. Therefore, they must hold for any arbitrarily chosen values for a and b. Choosing certain a's and b's allows us to get rid of c_1 or c_2 allowing us to solve for the other and showing that they are equal to 0. $\endgroup$ Mar 18 '18 at 0:17
  • $\begingroup$ @OrrenRavid: They were chosen due to their ability to form a general vector in $V$ when multiplied by the corresponding functionals applied to $v$ and put in a linear combination, but this choice isn't arbitrary. Since $f_1,f_2$ are linearly independent, the vectors $v_1,v_2$ are determined uniquely by this condition. $\endgroup$
    – levap
    Mar 18 '18 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ I agree that the choice isn't arbitrary when choosing $v_1$ and $v_2$ as I say in my edit to my original question. However, am I correct in my comment about the choices of a and b when proving linear independence? $\endgroup$ Mar 18 '18 at 0:58
  • $\begingroup$ @OrrenRavid: Yep, you are correct. $\endgroup$
    – levap
    Mar 18 '18 at 2:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.