Consider the sequence $c_n=(-1)^{n-1}n$
Show that $\sum c_n$ is not Cesaro summable using the hint: "If $\sum c_n$ is Cesaro summable, then $\frac {c_n}{n}$ tends to $0$"

the $N^{th}$ Cesaro sum of the series $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_k$ is $\sigma_N=\frac {s_1+\cdots s_N}{N}$, where $s_n=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_k$

So $\sigma_n-\frac{n-1}{n}\sigma_{n-1}= \frac {s_n}{n}$ but in the solution manual it says that $\sigma_n-\frac{n-1}{n}\sigma_{n-1}= \frac {c_n}{n} \tag {*}$ and concludes that $\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac {(-1)^{n-1}n}{n}\neq 0$ , which I agree..
But I didn't understand the starred part.
By the way are the notations $\sum c_n$ and $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_k$ the same?

  • $\begingroup$ Just look at $\dfrac{c_n}{n}$ and see if it tends to zero? $\endgroup$
    – dezdichado
    Mar 16, 2018 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, I definitely understand this, but I just didn't get what the book meant there @dezdichado $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2018 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ you are mistaken. $\sigma_n - \dfrac{n-1}{n}\sigma_{n-1}$ is indeed equal to $\dfrac{c_n}{n}.$ Your challenge would be to prove that the left hand side tends to $0$, provided that $\sigma_n\to \sigma,$ some finite number. $\endgroup$
    – dezdichado
    Mar 16, 2018 at 5:17
  • $\begingroup$ @dezdichado This is how I do that: $\sigma_n=\frac {s_1+\cdots +s_n}{n}, \sigma_{n-1}=\frac {s_1+\cdots +s_{n-1}}{n-1} $ so, $\frac {s_1+\cdots +s_n}{n}-\frac{n-1}{n}\frac {s_1+\cdots +s_{n-1}}{n-1}=\frac {s_n}{n}$ How do you get $\frac {c_n}{n}$? $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2018 at 5:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ never mind, I got it wrong. $\endgroup$
    – dezdichado
    Mar 16, 2018 at 6:28

2 Answers 2


I believe there is a misprint and it is $\frac {s_n} n$ that must tend to $0$. Now look at $s_n$, say for odd n and group the terms 2-by-2. You can easily see that $\frac {s_n} n$ does not tend to $0$ so $\sum c_n$ is not Cesaro summable. And yes, $\sum c_n$ is just a short form for $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} c_k$.

  • $\begingroup$ By the way, there is another question about this topic: Again we need to prove that " if $\sum c_n$ is Cesaro summable to $\sigma$, then $\sum c_n$ converges to $\sigma$ "And the author proves that $s_n-\sigma_n\rightarrow 0$ and concludes the proof with that. Showing $s_n-\sigma_n\rightarrow 0$ instead of $\sigma_n\rightarrow \sigma$ is somehow serving the same purpose? $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2018 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ I think you are referring to Hardy's Tauberian Theorem. You need an extra condition on $c_n$ to show $s_n-\sigma_n \to 0$. You can get proofs of Hardy's theorem on the net easily. $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2018 at 8:36

By direct calculation we have



$\frac {1}{2m}\sigma_{2m}=0.$

$\frac {1}{2m-1}\sigma_{2m-1}=\frac {-m}{4m-2}.$

For example $s_6=(1-2)+(3-4)+(5-6)=-3.$ And $s_7=s_6+c_7=(-3)+7=4.$

And $\sigma_6=$ $=\frac {1}{6}((s_1+s_2)+(s_3+s_4)+(s_5+s_6))=\frac {1}{6}((1/2-1/2)+(2/2-2/2)+(3/2-3/2))=0.$ And $\sigma_7=\frac {1}{7}(6\sigma_6+s_7)=\frac {1}{7}(0+(-4/2))=\frac {-4}{14}.$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.