0
$\begingroup$

I'm currently going over some ODEs, some help would be appreciated, a past exam says the following:

An electrical circuit consists of a capacitor, $C$, an inductance, $L$, an ammeter with resistance $R$, and an open switch, all connected in series.The capacitor initially carries a charge $Q_0$. At time $t = 0$ , the switch is closed and it is observed that current starts to flow and that, initially, the current is given by $I_0 = -\frac{5R}{L} $. The charge carried by the capacitor is described by the differential equation $$L\frac{dI}{dt} + RI + \frac{Q}{C} = 0$$ As $I = \frac{dQ}{dt}$, we can write the above equation as $$L \frac{d^2 Q}{dt^2} + R\frac{dQ}{dt} + \frac{Q}{C} = 0$$ We are asked to prove that $Q(t) = Q_0e^{-\frac{Rt}{2L}}\cos(\omega t + \phi)$ is a solution, which I did. $$\omega = \sqrt{\frac{1}{C} - \frac{R^2}{4L^2}}$$

My question is: How do you solve for $Q_0$ and $\phi$?

EDIT: The question says to find the above values, surely that would mean values of R, L and C are needed? So would it just mean find the functions?

EDIT 2: Here's the question in its entirety.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $Q_{0}$ is constant initial charge of capacitor you needn't solve for it $\endgroup$ – Faraday Pathak Mar 16 '18 at 0:07
  • $\begingroup$ @veereshpandey the paper asks you to calculate the values of $Q_0$ and $\phi$ , I understood what $Q_0$ is, just not how to calculate it. $\endgroup$ – Callum Mar 16 '18 at 1:19
-1
$\begingroup$

Differentiating the general solution

\begin{align} Q(t) &= e^{-\frac{Rt}{2L}}(A\cos \omega t+B\sin \omega t) \\ Q'(t) &= e^{-\frac{Rt}{2L}} \left[ \left( \omega B-\frac{AR}{2L} \right) \cos \omega t- \left( \omega A+\frac{BR}{2L} \right) \sin \omega t \right] \end{align}

Equating the boundary conditions $$ \left \{ \begin{align} Q(0) &= Q_0 \\ Q'(0) &= I_0 \end{align} \right.$$

Put $t=0$,

$$\left \{ \begin{align} Q_0 &= A \\ I_0 &= \omega B-\frac{AR}{2L} \end{align} \right.$$

On solving,

$$ \left \{ \begin{align} A &= Q_0 \\ B &= \frac{I_0}{\omega}+\frac{Q_0 R}{2L\omega} \end{align} \right.$$

Therefore,

\begin{align} Q(t) &= e^{-\frac{Rt}{2L}} \left[ Q_0 \cos \omega t+ \left( \frac{I_0}{\omega}+\frac{Q_0 R}{2L\omega} \right) \sin \omega t \right] \\ Q_{\text{envelope}} &= e^{-\frac{Rt}{2L}} \sqrt{Q_0^2+ \left( \frac{I_0}{\omega}+\frac{Q_0 R}{2L\omega} \right)^2} \\ \tan \phi &= -\frac{1}{\omega} \left( \frac{I_0}{Q_0}+\frac{R}{2L} \right) \end{align}

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you walk me through the steps of what you did? I assume you've done the complementary equation to get the first line, then differentiated and substituted to get the next few. There I get lost. $\endgroup$ – Callum Mar 16 '18 at 1:27
  • $\begingroup$ The first line is the general solution for $Q(t)$, differentiating gives the current $Q'(t)$, put $t=0$ to equate initial conditions. $\endgroup$ – Ng Chung Tak Mar 16 '18 at 13:06
1
$\begingroup$

there is something wrong in the question

$I_{0}\neq-5\dfrac{R}{L}$

because LHS has S.I. unit in $Amperes$. whereas R.H.S has S.I. unit in $(seconds)^-1$

so, this information is dimensionally incorrect .they can never be equal

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure? R would be in $\Omega$ and L in $H$ I believe. What they are in Base SI should be equal to $I$. Surely a university wouldn't have such an error in the question. $\endgroup$ – Callum Mar 16 '18 at 10:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Callum: S.I. unit of $\dfrac{L}{R}$ i.e,time constant of LR circuit, is $seconds$ so it's reciprocal $\dfrac{R}{L}$ must have S.I . unit as $ seconds^{-1} $ $\endgroup$ – Faraday Pathak Mar 16 '18 at 16:47
1
$\begingroup$

a) there is a typo in your expression for $\omega$: it shall be $$ \omega = \sqrt {{1 \over {LC}} - {{R^{\,2} } \over {4L^{\,2} }}} = \sqrt {{1 \over {LC}}} \;\,\sqrt {1 - {{\left( {R/\left( {2L} \right)} \right)^{\,2} } \over {LC}}} $$

b) you shall write the general solution as $$ Q(t) = Ae^{\, - \,{R \over {2L}}\,t} \cos \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) $$ which then gives $$ I(t) = - \,{R \over {2L}}Ae^{\, - \,{R \over {2L}}\,t} \cos \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) - \omega Ae^{\, - \,{R \over {2L}}\,t} \sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) $$

c) you shall then impose the initial conditions $$ \left\{ \matrix{ Q(0) = Q_{\,0} = A\cos \varphi \hfill \cr I(0) = I_{\,0} = - \,{R \over {2L}}A\cos \varphi - \omega A\sin \varphi \hfill \cr} \right. $$ to get $$ \left\{ \matrix{ \tan \varphi = - {1 \over \omega }\left( {I_{\,0} /Q_{\,0} + {R \over {2L}}} \right) \hfill \cr A = Q_{\,0} /\cos \varphi \hfill \cr} \right. $$

d) dimensionally wise $I_0$ cannot be $-5R/L$ (which has the dimension of 1/time), as already rightly pointed out by v. pandey, it might be probably $I_0/Q_0=-5R/L$.

e) also, it is physically impossible, in a series RLC circuit, that immediately upon closing the switch you can have a non-null current: the L will impede that to occur; you will have instead a current that starts from zero with a derivative $V_0/L=Q_0/(LC)$ (apart the sign).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How does $Q(0) = Q_0$ imply $\phi = 0$? $\endgroup$ – Callum Mar 16 '18 at 1:33
  • $\begingroup$ @callum: you are right: there was some confusion around, I recasted my answer to try and put the picture in focus $\endgroup$ – G Cab Mar 16 '18 at 11:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.