4
$\begingroup$

$ A = \pmatrix{0&-3&0\\3&0&0\\0&0&-1}$

Compute the $e^{At}$. Well, the first problem of this is to calculate the inverse of $A$ using Cayley-Hamilton theorem. But for this second problem, I don't know how to solve it, should I use the Cayley-Hamilton theorem?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why do you need to invert $A$ in order to compute its exponential? $\endgroup$ – amd Mar 10 '18 at 18:46
  • $\begingroup$ He didn't said he needed to. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Mar 10 '18 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ Is $t$ a scalar? $\endgroup$ – Nick Peterson Mar 10 '18 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ What exactly is your question, then? $\endgroup$ – amd Mar 10 '18 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ Your book covers this, no? $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Mar 10 '18 at 23:17
8
$\begingroup$

Note that the powers of $A$ are very regular, so calculating the exponential explicitly is not hard.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

You can use Cayley-Hamilton to compute this exponential by noting that the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is a cubic, so that any polynomial in $A$ can be reduced to the quadratic remainder after dividing by $A$’s characteristic polynomial. This also extends to $f(A)$, where $f$ is an analytic function. It’s not too difficult to show that if $R$ is this remainder polynomial, then for any eigenvalue $\lambda_i$ of $A$, $f(\lambda_i)=R(\lambda_i)$. Therefore, $$e^{At}=\alpha_0 I+\alpha_1 A+\alpha_2 A^2$$ for some unknown coefficients $\alpha_i$ that can be determined from the equations $$e^{\lambda_i t}=\alpha_0+\alpha_1 \lambda_i+\alpha_2 \lambda_i^2,$$ which is a system of linear equations in the unknown coefficients $\alpha_i$. (If there’s a repeated eigenvalue, these equations need a small tweak, but that’s not the case for this matrix.)

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Explicitly calculating the characteristic polynomial yields $$p_A(x) = -(x^2+9)(x+1) = -(x-3i)(x+3i)(x+1)$$ so $\sigma(A) = \{3i, -3i, -1\}$.

Therefore, $A$ is diagonalizable and after a bit of computation we find:

$$A = PDP^{-1} = \frac12\pmatrix{i & -i & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1}\pmatrix{3i & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -3i & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1}\pmatrix{-i & 1 & 0 \\ i & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2}$$

Therefore, assuming that $t \in \mathbb{C}$ is a scalar, we get:

\begin{align} e^{At} = \frac12\pmatrix{i & -i & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1}\pmatrix{e^{3it} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-3it} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & e^{-t}}\pmatrix{-i & 1 & 0 \\ i & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2} = \pmatrix{\frac{e^{3it}+e^{-3it}}{2} & -\frac{e^{3it}-e^{-3it}}{2i} & 0 \\ \frac{e^{3it}-e^{-3it}}{2i} & \frac{e^{3it}+e^{-3it}}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & e^{-t}}\\ \end{align}

This can be written as

$$e^{At} = \pmatrix{\cos 3t & -\sin 3t & 0 \\ \sin 3t & \cos 3t & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & e^{-t}}$$

which is a real matrix if $t \in \mathbb{R}$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.