-1
$\begingroup$

(1) Given an example of sets $A_1\subseteq A_2 \subseteq\dots$ in $\mathbb{R}$ such that each $A_n$ is bounded and $$\bigcap ^{\infty}_{n=1}A_n= \emptyset.$$

(2) Given an example of sets $A_1\subseteq A_2 \subseteq\dots $ in $\mathbb{R}$ such that each $A_n$ is closed and $$\bigcap ^{\infty}_{n=1}A_n= \emptyset.$$ enter image description here

My attempt:

For (2) $A_n=[n,\infty)$

(1) $\left\{\left(0,\frac{1}{n}\right) \right\}^\infty _{n=1}$

Am I correct?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You have the containment sign backwards in statement (1). Other than that, it looks good. $\endgroup$ – saulspatz Mar 8 '18 at 3:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your answers do not satisfy $A_k \subseteq A_{k+1}$. The reverse containment is satisfied. Indeed, the stated requirements cannot be satisfied unless $A_1 = \emptyset$, for both problems. $\endgroup$ – Bungo Mar 8 '18 at 3:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Bungo.. you mean that not satisffies increasing property right? $\endgroup$ – Inverse Problem Mar 8 '18 at 3:20
  • $\begingroup$ Correct, your sequences are both decreasing, not increasing. Are you sure the problem statements should not request $A_1 \supseteq A_2 \supseteq \cdots$? $\endgroup$ – Bungo Mar 8 '18 at 3:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Bungo..please can you give me examples $\endgroup$ – Inverse Problem Mar 8 '18 at 3:22
1
$\begingroup$

Nope this is incorrect. In fact with $A_1\subseteq A_2 \subseteq..... \subset \mathbb{R}$ we have $$\bigcap ^{\infty}_{n=1}A_n=A_1$$ therefore $$A_1=\emptyset.$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.